اثر کنزیوتیپینگ آبداکتوری و چرخش دهندگی خارجی ران بر روی طیف فرکانس نیروی عکس‌العمل زمین طی دویدن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار بیومکانیک ورزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

2 گروه تربیت‌بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد فیزیولوژی ورزشی، گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه و اهداف
نواربندی روش معمولی است که ورزشکاران برای بهبود درد استفاده می­کنند. هدف مطالعه حاضر ارزیابی اثر آنی نواربندی عضلات چرخش­دهنده خارجی و آبداکتور ران بر محتوای فرکانسی مؤلفه­های نیروی عکس­العمل زمین در طی فاز اتکای دویدن بود.
مواد و روش ­ها
24 مرد سالم (سن: 5/2±6/24 سال) داوطلب شرکت در مطالعه شدند. داده­های نیروی عکس­العمل زمین به وسیله دستگاه صفحه­نیرو کیستلر (نرخ نمونه­برداری: 1000 هرتز) قبل و بعد از نواربندی عضلات آبداکتوری و چرخش­دهندگی خارجی ران اندازه­گیری شد. آزمونt  زوجی جهت تحلیل آماری مورد استفاده قرار گرفت.
یافته ­ها
در مقایسه با شرایط بدون نواربندی، نواربندی ران به طور معنا­داری سبب افزایش محتوای فرکانسی با توان 5/99 درصد (034/0=p) و تعداد هارمونی­های ضروری (007/0=p) در راستای عمودی طی فاز اتکای دویدن شد. اعمال نواربندی محتوای فرکانسی را در دو راستای قدامی-خلفی و داخلی-خارجی تغییر نداد (05/0p>).
نتیجه ­گیری
نواربندی چرخشی و آبداکتوری ران سبب افزایش طیف فرکانس در راستای عمودی شده که یک ریسک­فاکتور افزایش احتمال آسیب طی دویدن است. با این وجود، مطالعات بیشتر در این زمینه توصیه می­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of Femoral External Rotational and Abductoral Taping on Frequency Content of Ground Reaction Forces during Running

نویسندگان [English]

  • AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero 1
  • Elham Sorkheh 2
  • Milad Alipoor Sarinasilou 3
1 Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Educational Science and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
3 MSc Student of Sport Physiology, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardebil, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Aims: Taping is a common method used by athletes to improve pain. The aim of the present study was to assess the immediate effect of femoral external rotational and abductoral taping on frequency content of ground reaction forces during stance phase of running.
Materials and Methods: A total of 24 healthy men (age: 24.6 ± 2.5 years) volunteered to participate in the study. Ground reaction force data was recorded using a Kistler force platform (sampling rate: 1000 Hz) before and after hip abductoral and external rotator muscles taping. Paired sample t-test was used for statistical analysis.
Results: Compared to without taping condition, taping significantly increased the frequency content with power 99.5% power (P=0.034) and essential number of harmonics (P=0.007) for vertical ground reaction force during stance phase of running. Taping application did not change frequency content of anterior-posterior and medio-lateral ground reaction forces (P>0.05).
Conclusion: Femoral external rotational and abductoral taping increased the values ​​of frequency content of ground reaction forces in vertical direction, which is a risk factor of injury during running. However, further study is warranted to provide more support.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Taping
  • Running
  • ground reaction force
  • Frequency content
1.   van Mechelen, W., Running injuries. Sports Medicine, 1992. 14(5): p. 320-335.##
2.   Fields, K.B., et al., Prevention of running injuries. Current sports medicine reports, 2010. 9(3): p. 176-182. ##
3.   Van Gent, B.R., et al., Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review. British journal of sports medicine, 2007. ##
4.   Southwick, H. and M. Crupi, A Screening Program for the Young Dancer: Perspectives on What and Why to Include in a Screen, in Prevention of Injuries in the Young Dancer. 2017, Springer. p. 43-62. ##
5.   Telles, G., et al., The effect of adding myofascial techniques to an exercise programme for patients with anterior knee pain. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2016. 20(4): p. 844-850. ##
6.   Khayambashi, K., et al., Hip muscle strength predicts noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in male and female athletes: a prospective study. The American journal of sports medicine, 2016. 44(2): p. 355-361. ##
7.   Cerny, K., J. Perry, and J.M. Walker, Effect of an unrestricted knee-ankle-foot orthosis on the stance phase of gait in healthy persons. Orthopedics, 1990. 13(10): p. 1121-1127. ##
8.   Souza, R.B. and C.M. Powers, Differences in hip kinematics, muscle strength, and muscle activation between subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy, 2009. 39(1): p. 12-19. ##
9.   Fellin, R.E., K. Manal, and I.S. Davis, Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running. Journal of applied biomechanics, 2010. 26(4): p. 407-414. ##
10. Chuter, V.H. and X.A.J. de Jonge, Proximal and distal contributions to lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Gait & posture, 2012. 36(1): p. 7-15. ##
11. Dowling, G.J., et al., Dynamic foot function as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review. Journal of foot and ankle research, 2014. 7(1): p. 53. ##
12. Alexander, C.M., M. McMullan, and P.J. Harrison, What is the effect of taping along or across a muscle on motoneurone excitability? A study using triceps surae. Manual therapy, 2008. 13(1): p. 57-62. ##
13. Chang, H.-Y., et al., Immediate effect of forearm Kinesio taping on maximal grip strength and force sense in healthy collegiate athletes. Physical Therapy in Sport, 2010. 11(4): p. 122-127. ##
14. Halseth, T., et al., The effects of kinesio™ taping on proprioception at the ankle. Journal of sports science & medicine, 2004. 3(1): p. 1. ##
15. Herrington, L., The effect of patella taping on quadriceps strength and functional performance in normal subjects. Physical Therapy in Sport, 2004. 5(1): p. 33-36. ##
16. Giakas, G., et al., Comparison of gait patterns between healthy and scoliotic patients using time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces. Spine, 1996. 21(19): p. 2235-2242. ##
17. Stergiou, N., et al., Frequency domain characteristics of ground reaction forces during walking of young and elderly females. Clinical Biomechanics, 2002. 17(8): p. 615-617. ##
18. Stergiou, N., Innovative analyses of human movement. 2004: Human Kinetics Publishers. ##
19. Tsepis, E., et al., Frequency content asymmetry of the isokinetic curve between ACL deficient and healthy knee. Journal of biomechanics, 2004. 37(6): p. 857-864##.
20. Gruber, A.H., et al., A comparison of the ground reaction force frequency content during rearfoot and non-rearfoot running patterns. Gait & Posture, 2017. 56: p. 54-59. ##
21. White, R., I. Agouris, and E. Fletcher, Harmonic analysis of force platform data in normal and cerebral palsy gait. Clinical Biomechanics, 2005. 20(5): p. 508-516. ##
22. Schneider, E. and E. Chao, Fourier analysis of ground reaction forces in normals and patients with knee joint disease. Journal of biomechanics, 1983. 16(8): p. 591-601. ##
23. Wurdeman, S.R., et al., Multiple sclerosis affects the frequency content in the vertical ground reaction forces during walking. Clinical Biomechanics, 2011. 26(2): p. 207-212. ##
24. McGrath, D., et al., Peripheral arterial disease affects the frequency response of ground reaction forces during walking. Clinical Biomechanics, 2012. 27(10): p. 1058-1063. ##
25. Stief, F., et al., Effect of lower limb malalignment in the frontal plane on transverse plane mechanics during gait in young individuals with varus knee alignment. The Knee, 2014. 21(3): p. 688-693. ##
26. Jafarnezhadgero, A.A., M. Majlesi, and E. Azadian, Gait ground reaction force characteristics in deaf and hearing children. Gait & posture, 2017. 53: p. 236-240. ##
27. Pamukoff, D.N., M.D. Lewek, and J.T. Blackburn, Greater vertical loading rate in obese compared to normal weight young adults. Clinical Biomechanics, 2016. 33: p. 61-65. ##
28. Willwacher, S., et al., The free moment in running and its relation to joint loading and injury risk. Footwear Science, 2016. 8(1): p. 1-11. ##
29. Fukaya, T., H. Mutsuzaki, and Y. Wadano, Kinematic analysis of knee varus and rotation movements at the initial stance phase with severe osteoarthritis of the knee. The Knee, 2015. 22(3): p. 213-216. ##
30. Winter, D.A., Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2009: John Wiley & Sons. ##
31. Judkins, T.N., et al., Robotic surgery and training: electromyographic correlates of robotic laparoscopic training. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2006. 20(5): p. 824-829. ##
32. Song, C.-Y., et al., Effects of femoral rotational taping on pain, lower extremity kinematics, and muscle activation in female patients with patellofemoral pain. Journal of science and medicine in sport, 2015. 18(4): p. 388-393. ##
33. Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . Hilsdale. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988. 2. ##
34. Sinkjær, T., J.B. Andersen, and B. Larsen, Soleus stretch reflex modulation during gait in humans. Journal of neurophysiology, 1996. 76(2): p. 1112-1120. ##
35. Cronin, N.J., et al., Mechanical and neural stretch responses of the human soleus muscle at different walking speeds. The Journal of physiology, 2009. 587(13): p. 3375-3382. ##
36. Dingwell, J.B., J. John, and J.P. Cusumano, Do humans optimally exploit redundancy to control step variability in walking? PLoS computational biology, 2010. 6(7): p. e1000856. ##
37. Hamill, J., T. Derrick, and K. Holt, Shock attenuation and stride frequency during running. Human movement science, 1995. 14(1): p. 45-60. ##
38. White, L.J. and R.H. Dressendorfer, Exercise and multiple sclerosis. Sports medicine, 2004. 34(15): p. 1077-1100. ##
39. Nigg, B.M., Biomechanics of running shoes. 1986: Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics Publishers. ##
40. Williams, D.S., et al., High-arched runners exhibit increased leg stiffness compared to low-arched runners. Gait & posture, 2004. 19(3): p. 263-269. ##
41. Williams III, D.S., et al., Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic differences in runners with high and low arches. Journal of applied biomechanics, 2001. 17(2): p. 153-163. ##