شیوع اختلالات صوت در معلمان دبستان های شهر اراک در سال 1396

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه گفتاردرمانی، دانشکده توانبخشی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اراک، اراک، ایران

2 گروه آمارزیستی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اراک، اراک، ایران

3 گروه گفتاردرمانی، دانشکده توانبخشی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه و اهداف
با توجه به اینکه مشکلات صوتی می­تواند تاثیر زیادی بر توانایی کاری معلمان و در نتیجه جامعه داشته باشد، هدف از مطالعه حاضر بررسی شیوع اختلالات صوت در معلمان دبستان­ های شهر اراک بود.
مواد و روش ها
مطالعه کنونی شیوع اختلال صوت را در 965 معلم پایه اول تا ششم دبستان ­های شهر اراک با استفاده از پرسشنامه سنجش اختلالات صوت ویژه معلمان مقطع ابتدایی که از روایی و پایایی بالایی برخوردار است، مورد بررسی قرار داد. افرادی که نمره 9 یا بالاتر گرفتند به عنوان معلمان مبتلا به اختلالات صوت طبقه ­بندی شدند.
یافته­ ها
شیوع اختلال صوت در معلمان دبستان­ های شهر اراک، %28/9 (29/9% از معلمان مرد و 28/9% از معلمان زن) می­ باشد. بین پایه تحصیلی مورد تدریس معلم و شیوع اختلال صوت (0/815=Pvalue) و جنسیت معلم و شیوع اختلال صوت (0/666=Pvalue) تفاوت معناداری مشاهده نشد، ولی بین نوع مدرسه (0/001=Pvalue) و نوع ناحیه (1 یا 2) (0/044=Pvalue) و شیوع این اختلال تفاوت معنادار مشاهده شد.
نتیجه گیری
به­ طورکلی شیوع کل اختلال صوت در معلمان برابر 28/9% است که عوامل جنسیت و پایه تحصیلی مورد تدریس تفاوتی در میزان شیوع این اختلال ایجاد نمی­ نماید، ولی نوع مدرسه و ناحیه تحصیلی در شیوع این اختلال موثر است.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prevalence of Voice Disorder among Primary Teachers in the City of Arak- 2018

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdolreza Yavari 1
  • akram valizadeh 1
  • Danial Habibi 2
  • Fariba Mojiri 3
1 MSc, Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Arak University of Medical Science, Arak, Iran
2 Department of Biostatistics, Medical School, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
3 MSc,Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Esfahan University of Medical Sciences, Esfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Aims: Given that voice problems can have a huge impact on the teachers' ability to work and as a result on the whole society, the aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of voice disorders in primary school teachers in Arak.
Materials and Methods: To evaluate the prevalence of voice disorders, 965 teachers of the first to sixth levels from Arak primary schools were evaluated using voice Disorders Questionnaire for primary School Teachers, which enjoys high reliability and validity indices. Particpants who received score 9 or higher were classified as teachers with voice disorders.
Results: The prevalence of voice disorders among primary school teachers in Arak was 28.9% (29.9%, male teachers and 28.9% female teachers). Increase in the teaching grade ( P = 0.815) and the teacher's gender ( P = 0.666) did not significantly increase the prevalence of the disorder, but the type of school (P = 0.001) and the type of area (1 or 2) with P = 0.044 had a significant effect on the prevalence of this disorder.
Conclusion: In general, the prevalence of voice disorder in teachers was found to be 28.9%. Gender and the basis of teaching factors do not make a difference in the prevalence of this disorder, but the type of school and educational area is effective in the prevalence of this disorder.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Prevalence
  • Teachers
  • Voice Disorders

مراجع

  1. Verdolini K, Ramig LO. Occupational risks for voice problems. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology. 2001;26(1):37-46.##
  2. Titze IR, Lemke J, Montequin D. Populations in the US workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: a preliminary report. Journal of Voice. 1997;11(3):254-9. ##
  3. Cutiva LCC, Vogel I, Burdorf A. Voice disorders in teachers and their associations with work-related factors: a systematic review. Journal of Communication Disorders. 2013;46(2):143-55. ##
  4. Vilkman E. Occupational safety and health aspects of voice and speech professions. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2004;56(4):220-53. ##
  5. Pasa G, Oates J, Dacakis G. The relative effectiveness of vocal hygiene training and vocal function exercises in preventing voice disorders in primary school teachers. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology. 2007;32(3):128-40. ##
  6. Ilomäki I, Mäki E, Laukkanen A-M. Vocal symptoms among teachers with and without voice education. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology. 2005;30(3-4):171-4. ##
  7. Roy N, Merrill RM, Thibeault S, Gray SD, Smith EM. Voice disorders in teachers and the general population. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2004. ##
  8. Behlau M, Zambon F, Guerrieri AC, Roy N. Epidemiology of voice disorders in teachers and nonteachers in Brazil: prevalence and adverse effects. Journal of voice. 2012;26(5):665. e9-. e18. ##
  9. Williams N, Carding P. Occupational voice loss: CRC Press; 2005. ##

10. Smith E, Gray SD, Dove H, Kirchner L, Heras H. Frequency and effects of teachers' voice problems. Journal of voice. 1997;11(1):81-7. ##

11. Smith E, Lemke J, Taylor M, Kirchner HL, Hoffman H. Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other occupations. Journal of voice. 1998;12(4):480-8. ##

12. Gauffin J. Vocal fold physiology: acoustic, perceptual, and physiological aspects of voice mechanisms: Singular Publ.; 1991. ##

13. Dehqan A, Scherer RC. Acoustic analysis of voice: Iranian teachers. Journal of Voice. 2013;27(5):655. e17-. e21. ##

14. Hogikyan ND, Rosen CA. A review of outcome measurements for voice disorders. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2002;126(5):562-72. ##

15. Behforooz N, Kashani ZA, Ghorbani A, Hoseyni F. Developing and studying of the voice disorder symptoms questionnaire in adults. Bimonthly Audiology-Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2012;21(2):26-34. ##

16. Mojiri F, Shekari E, Ashoorion V. Determination of Psychometric Characteristics Of Isfahan Primary Schoolteachers'specific Voice Disorders Questionnaires. 2014;1038-1049. ##

17. Solgi E, Esmaili-Sari A, Riyahi-Bakhtiari A, Hadipour M. Soil contamination of metals in the three industrial estates, Arak, Iran. Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2012;88(4):634-8. ##

18. Hermes EGC, de Oliveira Bastos PRH. The Prevalence of Teachers' Vocal Symptoms in Municipal Network of Education in Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Journal of Voice. 2016;30(6):756. e1-e7. ##

19. Preciado-López J, Pérez-Fernández C, Calzada-Uriondo M, Preciado-Ruiz P. Epidemiological study of voice disorders among teaching professionals of La Rioja, Spain. Journal of voice. 2008;22(4):489-508. ##

20. Seifpanahi S, Izadi F, Jamshidi A-A, Torabinezhad F, Sarrafzadeh J, Sobhani-Rad D, et al. Prevalence of voice disorders and associated risk factors in teachers and nonteachers in Iran. Journal of Voice. 2016;30(4):506. 19-23. ##

21. Baghiyani Mm, Lalegani Z, Morowaty M, Karimi G, Fallah Zh. Prevalence of Disphonia in teachers elementary schools of Yazd city Iran, and their knowledge and practice to it. Modern Care Journal. 2011; 8(2):79-85. ##

22. Sundram ER, Norsa’adah B, Mohamad H, Moy FM, Husain NRN, Shafei MN. The Effectiveness of a Voice Care Program Among Primary School Teachers in Northeastern Malaysia. Oman medical journal. 2019;34(1):49. ##

23. Leão SHdS, Oates JM, Purdy SC, Scott D, Morton RP. Voice problems in New Zealand teachers: a national survey. Journal of Voice. 2015;29(5):645. 1-13. ##

24. Angelillo IF, Di Maio G, Costa G, Barillari U. Prevalence. of occupational voice disorders in teachers. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene. 2009;50(1):26-32##

25. Kooijman PG, De Jong F, Thomas G, Huinck W, Donders R, Graamans K, et al. Risk factors for voice problems in teachers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2006;58(3):159-74. ##

26. Roy N, Merrill RM, Thibeault S, Parsa RA, Gray SD, Smith EM. Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2004. ##

27. Sebastian S, Suresh BA, Simon S, Ballraj A. Risk factors for hyperfunctional voice disorders among teachers. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences. 2012 Jul 25;11(2 (6)). ##

28. Korn GP, de Lima Pontes AA, Abranches D, de Lima Pontes PA. Hoarseness and risk factors in university teachers. Journal of Voice. 2015;29(4):518. 21-28. ##

29. Benninger MS, Holy CE, Bryson PC, Milstein CF. Prevalence and occupation of patients presenting with dysphonia in the United States. Journal of Voice. 2017;31(5):594-600. ##

30. Akinbode R, Lam K, Ayres J, Sadhra S. Voice disorders in Nigerian primary school teachers. Occupational Medicine. 2014;64(5):382-6. ##

31. Roy N, Merrill RM, Gray SD, Smith EM. Voice disorders in the general population: prevalence, risk factors, and occupational impact. The Laryngoscope. 2005;115(11):1988-95. ##

32. Miller MK, Verdolini K. Frequency and risk factors for voice problems in teachers of singing and control subjects. Journal of Voice. 1995;9(4):348-62. ##

33. Klingholz F, Penning R, Liebhardt E. Recognition of low‐level alcohol intoxication from speech signal. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1988;84(3):929-35. ##

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی طب توانبخشی
دوره 9، شماره 2
تیر 1399
صفحه 118-124

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 09 خرداد 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 24 تیر 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 19 مرداد 1398
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 تیر 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار