The immediate effect of Kinesio tape on the variation of shoulder position sense at different angles in patients with impingement syndrome

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 Student Research Committee, MSc in Physiotherapy, International Branch of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Physiotherapy, Dept. of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

3 3. Professor of Physiotherapy, Dept. of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

4 2. .Assistant Professor of Physiotherapy, Dept. of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

5 MSc in Biostatistics, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Aim: Kinesio tape has been considered as a supplementary treatment method for shoulder impingement syndrome. According to the fact that the acuity of the position sense varies at different joint range of motion, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Kinesio tape in different joint positions on position sense of subjects with shoulder impingement syndrome.
Materials and Methods: In this quasi-experimental study which was carried out on 12 subjects with shoulder impingement syndrome, the active joint position sense reconstruction test in the middle and inner range of abduction was applied for measuring the proprioception. 90º of shoulder abduction was considered as the baseline of the test.One third of the total range of motion was considered as the first aim angle, the half of the range of motion and available range of motion minus 10º was considered as the second and third aim angle respectively. In this study the Kinesio tape attached on the pectoralis major, the middle fibers of the Trapezius, deltoid and supraspinatus muscles. The repeated measure ANOVA was employed for investigation of the relationship between independent variables.
Results: the effect of tape showed significantly meaningfull difference (p=0.01) but the effect of diffent angles had no significant effect on repositioning test errors.
Conclusion: Kinesio tape results in proprioception improvement during shoulder abduction range of motion in paitents with shoulder impingement syndrome.

Keywords


  1. Thelen MD , Dauber JA, Stoneman PD. The clinical efficacy of kinesio  taPe for shoulder Pain: A  randomized double-blinded , Clinical Trial. Journal of orthoPaedic & sPorts Physical theraPy. 2008; 38(7):389-395##
  2. Jerosch J, Wüstner P. Effect of a sensorimotor training Program on Patients with subacromial Pain syndrome. Der Unfallchirurg. 2002;105(1):36 ##
  3. Glazier R, Dalby D, Badley E, Hawker G, Bell M, Buchbinder R. Management of common musculoskeletal Problems: survey of Ontario Primary care Physicians. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1998:158(8);1037.##
  4. Alqunaee M, Galvin R, Fahey T. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for subacromial imPingement syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:229-36##
  5. Brossmann J, Preidler K. W,Pedowitz A. A, White L.M,Resnick D. Shoulder ImPingement Syndrome: Influence of Shoulder Position on Rotator Cuff ImPingement-An Anatomic Study. AJR. 1996;167:1511-1515##
  6. Nodehi moghadam A, Ebrahimi E, Ziaee M, Aslani HR. Evaluation of shoulder ProPriocePtion in Patients with shoulder imPingement syndrome. The Iranian journal of bones and joints sergury. 1383:42-47##
  7. Borsa PA.,Scott ML, Kocher MS, LePhart SP. Functional Assessment and  Rehabiliation of Shoulder ProPiocePtion for Glenhoumeral Instability. Journal of SPort Rehabiliation. 1994,3:84-104##
  8. Myers JB, Oyama S. Sensorimotor factors affecting out come following shoulder injury. clinics in sPorts medicine. 2008;27: 481-490##
  9. Toshihiko Y, Tsuneo T, Masatoshi S, Hideki T, Masaki K. ProPriocePtors Physiological and morPhological characteristic. JPn J. Phys.Fitness SPort Med. 2006,55:207-216##
  10. Machner A, Merk H, Becker R, Rohkohl K, Wissel H, PaP G. Kinesthetic sense of shoulder in Patients with imPingement syndrome. Acta OrthoP Scand. 2003; 74 (1): 85–88##
  11. Kaya E, Zinnuroglu M, Tugcu I. Kinesio taPing comPared to Physical theraPy modalities for the treatment of shoulder imPingement syndrome. Clinical Rheumatology.2010;1-7##
  12. Murray H, Husk L. Effect of kinesio taPing on ProPriocePtion in the ankle. J OrthoP SPorts Physical TheraPy. 2001;31(1).##
  13. Lin JJ, Hung CJ, Yang PL.The Effects of ScaPular TaPing on ElectromyograPhic Muscle Activity and ProPriocePtion Feedback on Healthy shoulders. journal of orthoPedic research. 2011:53-57##
  14. Halthes T, McChesney JW, DeBeliso M, Vaughn R, lein J. The effect  of kinesio taPing on ProPriocePtion at the ankle. Journal of SPorts Science and Medicine. 2004 3: 1-7##
  15. Janwantanakul P, Magarey ME, Jones MA, Dansie BR. Variation in shoulder Position sense at mid and extreme range of motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:840-4.##
  16. Ludewig PM, Braman JP. Shoulder imPingement:Biomechanical considerations in rehabilitation. 2011;16(1):33-39##
  17. Ludewig P, Cook T. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in PeoPle with symPtoms of shoulder imPingement. Physical TheraPy. 2000;80(3):276##
  18. Borstad J, Ludewig P. ComParison of scaPular kinematics between elevation and lowering of the arm in the scaPular Plane. Clinical Biomechanics. 2002;17(9-10):650-9.##
  19. Silva L, Andreu J, Munoz P, Pastrana M, Millan I, Sanz J, et al. Accuracy of Physical examination in subacromial imPingement syndrome. Rheumatology. 2008;11:262##
  20. Zamiri S, Shaterzadeh Yazdi MJ, GoharPey Sh. Effect of theraPeutic exercise associated with facilitative taPing of selected shoulder girdle muscles on the activity level of these muscles in Patients with shoulder imPingement syndrome. Sci Med J. 2011; 10(2):163-170##
  21. McClure P, Michener L, Karduna A. Shoulder function and 3-dimensional scaPular kinematics in PeoPle with and without shoulder imPingement syndrome. Physical TheraPy. 2006;86(8):1075##
  22. YangJL, Chen S, Jan MH, Lin YF, Lin JJ. ProPriocePtion assessment in subjects with idioPathic loss of shoulder range of motion: Joint Position sense and a novel ProPriocePtive feedback index. journal of orthoPedic research. 2008;26:1218-1224##
  23. Blasier RB, CarPenter JE, Huston L. Shoulder ProPriocePtion: effect of joint laxity, joint Position and direction of motion. OrthoP Rev. 1994;23:45-50.##
  24. Kumar S, Syed N, Sirajudeen M, Karthikbabu S. Journal of Musculoskeletal Research. 2012;15(3):1250014-22##
  25. SuPrak DN,Osternig LR, van DP, Karduna AR. Shoulder Joint Position Sense ImProves With External Load. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2007; 39(6): 517–525##
  26. Konishi Yu. Tactile stimulation with Kinesiology taPe alleviates muscle weakness attributable to attenuation of Ia afferents.Journal of Science and Medicine in SPort. 2013;16:45–48##
  27. Niknam H, Sarmadi A, Salavati M, Madadi F. The effect of knee kinesiotaPing on ProPriocePtion and weight bearing in ACL reconstructed Patients. Scientific-Research Journal of Shahed University.2011;18(93)##
  28. Irlenbusch U, Gansen K. Muscle bioPsy investigations on neuromuscular insufficiency of the rotator cuff. J Shoulder Elbow surg. 2003;12(5):422-26##
  29. Book.Kumbrink B. K TaPing an Illustrated guide.2011.36-39;50-51;134-135##
  30. Dover G, Powers MD. Reliability of joint Position sense and force-reProduction measures during internal and external rotation of the shoulder. Journal of Athletic Training.2003;38(4):304–310##
Volume 4, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
July and August 2015
Pages 37-45
  • Receive Date: 18 January 2015
  • Revise Date: 17 March 2015
  • Accept Date: 27 April 2015
  • First Publish Date: 22 June 2015