Effect of neurofeedback training on dual balance tasks of motor and cognitive in older men

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 1. MSc Motor Behavior. Department of Human Motor Behavior. Urmia University. Urmia. Iran

2 2. Associate professsor. Department of Human Motor Behavior. Tabriz University. Tabriz. Iran

3 3. Assistant professsor. Department of Human Motor Behavior. Urmia University. Urmia. Iran

4 4. MSc Motor Behavior. Department of Human Motor Behavior. Tabriz University.Tabriz. Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: Increasing age increased the risk of acute and chronic diseases, but decreased functional capabilities of individuals and the power of the senses and perception.  The changes in the areas of ​​biological, psychological and social threatened quality of life for older persons, as far as keeping them from performing daily activities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of neurofeedback training on the quality of balance control under dual tasks conditions motor- balance and cognitive-balance in elderly men.
Materials and Methods: The research method is quasi-experimental that is conducted by Pre-test/ post-test method. subjects were 60 years and older in Tabriz, Iran and were selected on a voluntary basis. Thirty elderly volunteers were randomly divided into two groups: experimental and control groups. The TUG was measured under conditions of dual-task motor-balance (Run the test with a full cup of water transport) and Dual Task balance-cognitive (Countdown test with random numbers); before and after the neurofeedback training (Up to 15 sessions in 30-minute 3 times a week for 5 weeks).
Results: The results showed that neurofeedback training was significantly increased performance in elderly motor dual-task (p =0.001). But in dual-task cognitive performance, although the improvement had taken place, not statistical significant differences were observed (p =0.051).
Conclusion: The results suggest that the balance neurofeedback protocol improves balance performance under dual-task conditions, especially dual-motor task.

Keywords


1. Wei. Gregory Paynh, Larry D., Isaacs. "Human motor development; life." Translators: doctor Khalaji, H.; Khajavi, Darius. Published: Arak, publisher: University of Arak(2010).##
2. Shumway-cook A, & Woollacott M. Motor control. Third edition. New York. Lippincott Williams & Wilkin. 2007. 157-257. ##
3. Cole KJ, Rottela DL, & Harper JG. Mechanisms for age-related changes of fingertip forces during precision griping and lifting in adults. Journal of Neuroscience1999; 19: 3238-3247.##
4. Enoka RM, & Fuglevand AJ. Motor unit physiology: Some unresolved issues. Muscle and Never 2001; 24: 4-17.##
5. Hedden T, & Gabrieli JDE. Insights into the ageing mind: A view from cognitive neuroscience. Nature Review Neuroscience 2004; 5: 87-97. ##
6.  Ka-Chun Siu,Woollacott M. Attentional demands of postural control: The ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources. Gait Posture 2007;25: 121-126.##
7.  Shumway-cook A, & Woollacott M. Motor control. Third edition. New York. Lippincott Williams & Wilkin. 2007. 157-257.##
8.   Siu C. K. Chou SL,Woollacott HM. Attentional mechanisms contributing to balance constraints during gait: The effects of balance impairments. Brain Res 2009;1248: 59-67.##
9.  Berger L, Bernard-Demanze L. Age-related effects of a memorizing spatial task in the adults and elderly postural control. Gait & Posture 2011; 33 (2): 300-2.##
10. Shamway-cook A, Brauer S, & Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older using the timed up and go. Phy Ther 2000; 80: 896-903.##
11. Lundin-olsson L, Nyberg L, & Gustafson Y. Attention, frailty and falls: the effect of amanual task on basic mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 758-61.##
12. Nazary. M.A., Eskandarnejad.M.,abdoli.B.Vaez Mousavi. M.K., Can EEG biofeedback (neurofeedback)improve performance of novice athleates? 15th annual congrees of European collage of sport science. 11. Books of abstract. (2012)595- 597 ##
13. Agnihorti H. Paul M. sandhu J. S Biofeedback approach in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Iranian J psychiatry. (2007). 2:90-95##
14. Callahan A. Methods of compensation and reeducation for sensory    dysfunction. In: Hunter M Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity UK Mosby, (2002)701-714.##
15.  Rozelle GR, Budzynski TH. Neurotherapy for s troke r ehabilitation A single.c ase Study. Biofeedback Set Regul , (1995)20(3):211 -228.##
16. Moore J. P. Trudeau D.L. Thuras P. D. Rubin Y. stockley H. Dimond T, Comparison of alpha-theta, alpha and EMG neurofeedback in the production of alpha-theta crossover and the occurrence of visualizations. Journal of  neurotherapy, volume4, issue1, (2000) 29-42.##
17. Krezman H, Chetrit A, Brin L, & Toren O. Characteristics of falls in hospitalized patients. Journal of Advanced Nurse 2004; 47(2): 223-9.##
18. Hammond DC.nerofeed back for the enhancement of athletic performance and physical balance. The jour naloftheAmerican Board of  sport  psychology: (2007),1:v1-9##
19.  Hammond.D.C. (2006).What is neurofeedback? J of neurotherapy. 10(4). 25-36.##
20. Lemmer, J. T., Hurlbut, D., Martel, G., Tracy, B., Ivey, F., Matter, E., et al. Age and gender responses to strength training and detraining. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, (2000). 32(8), 1505-1512.##
21. Sadeghi-Naeinipour N, Nazari MA, Alizade-Zarei M. Kamali M. The effect of neuro feedback training on balance performance and attention shiftingin children with reading disorder. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences. 2013; 9(2): 185-196. [Persian].##
22. Vernon D. Egner T. Cooper N. Compton T. Neilands C.. Gruzelier J. The effect of training distinct  neurofeedback protocols on aspects of cognitive performance . Int J Psychophysiol. 2003, 47(1): 75- 85.##
23. Kristi B. Neurofeedback efficacy in the treatment of a 45-years old female stroke victim:A Case Study.Neurotherapy, 2010, 14(2):107-121.##
24. Radak Z, Kaneko T, Tahara S, Nakamoto H, Pucsok J, Sasvari M, et al. Regular exercise improves cognitive function and decreases oxidative damage in rat brain. Neurochem Int 2001; 38(1): 17-23.##
Volume 4, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
September and October 2015
Pages 18-26
  • Receive Date: 26 August 2014
  • Revise Date: 01 February 2015
  • Accept Date: 12 March 2015
  • First Publish Date: 23 September 2015