The relationship between the age when spectacles wear initiated and refractive error changes in children with accommodative esotropia

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 OD in Optometry, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Students' Research Office, MSc in Optometry, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 MSc in Biostatistics, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 Strabismus Department, Farabi Eye Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: Accommodative esotropia is the most common strabismus among children and its initial treatment is optical correction of the full refractive error. Considering the fact that emmetropization is controlled by refractive status of the eye and visual acuity, early correction of hyperopia in childhood may impede emmetropization. The purpose of the present study was to assess the relationship between age when spectacles wear initiated and refractive error changes in children with accommodative esotropia.
Materials and Method: In the present cross-sectional study, medical records of 1- to 8-year-old patients diagnosed with refractive accommodative esotropia (esotropia decreased to within 10∆ with full hyperopic correction) were reviewed and the refractive data was analyzed for 3 groups of children based on their age when spectacles wear initiated.
Results: A total of 62 patients were included in the study. The mean age when spectacles wear initiated was 2.5 years and the mean of follow-up period was 1.9 years. The relationship between age when spectacles wear initiated with changes in spherical equivalent and hyperopia was statistically significant (p<0.05), but with astigmatism it was not revealed to be significant (p>0.05). There is a negative relationship between spherical equivalent and hyperopia with the age when spectacles wear initiated.
Conclusion: The age when spectacles wear initiated is significantly correlated to the changes in spherical equivalent and hyperopia in children with accommodative esotropia. The lower the age when spectacles wear initiated, the higher the spherical equivalent and hyperopia. The possibility that full correction of hyperopia impedes emmetropization must be considered.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Mohney BG. Common forms of childhood esotropia. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(4):805-9.##
  2. Rutstein RP. Update on accommodative esotropia. Optometry-Journal of the American Optometric Association. 2008;79(8):422-31.##
  3. Yekta A, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Dehghani C, Ostadimoghaddam H, Heravian J, et al. The prevalence of anisometropia, amblyopia and strabismus in schoolchildren of Shiraz, Iran. Strabismus. 2010;18(3):104-10.##
  4. Faghihi M, Ostadimoghaddam H, Yekta AA. Amblyopia and strabismus in Iranian schoolchildren, Mashhad. Strabismus. 2011;19(4):147-52.##
  5. Yekta A, Hashemi H, Azizi E, et al. The prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus among schoolchildren in Northeastern Iran, 2011. Iranian journal of Ophthalmology. 2012;24(4):3-10.##
  6. Rashidpour P. The Prevalence of Esotropia among Less Than 8 years Old Children with Hyperopia More Than 3 Diopter Referred to Shafa Ocular Clinic from 27 Jan. 2008 to 26 Jan. 2009: School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran; 2012.##
  7. Troilo D, Wallman J. The regulation of eye growth and refractive state: an experimental study of emmetropization. Vision research. 1991;31(7):1237-50.##
  8. Wildsoet C. Active emmetropization—evidence for its existence and ramifications for clinical practice. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 1997;17(4):279-90.##
  9. Mayer DL, Hansen RM, Moore BD, Kim S, Fulton AB. Cycloplegic refractions in healthy children aged 1 through 48 months. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2001;119(11):1625-8.##
  10. Donahue SP. Prescribing spectacles in children: a pediatric ophthalmologist's approach. Optometry & Vision Science. 2007;84(2):110-4.##
  11. Lambert SR, Lynn MJ. Longitudinal changes in the spherical equivalent refractive error of children with accommodative esotropia. British journal of ophthalmology. 2006;90(3):357-61.##
  12. Lambert SR, Lynn M. Longitudinal changes in the cylinder power of children with accommodative esotropia. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2007;11(1):55-9.##
  13. Raab EL. Etiologic factors in accommodative esodeviation. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 1982;80:657.##
  14. Raab EL, Spierer A. Persisting accommodative esotropia. Archives of ophthalmology. 1986;104(12):1777-9.##
  15. Repka MX WK, Wisnicki HJ. Changes in the refractive error of 94 spectacle-treated patients with acquired accommodative esotropia. Binocul Vis. 1989;4:5-21.##
  16. Hutcheson KA, Ellish NJ, Lambert SR. Weaning children with accommodative esotropia out of spectacles: a pilot study. British journal of ophthalmology. 2003;87(1):4-7.##
  17. Black BC. The influence of refractive error management on the natural history and treatment outcome of accommodative esotropia (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society. 2006;104:303.##
  18. Aurell E, Norrsell K. A longitudinal study of children with a family history of strabismus: factors determining the incidence of strabismus. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1990;74(10):589-94.##
  19. Ingram RM, Arnold PE, Dally S, Lucas J. Emmetropisation, squint, and reduced visual acuity after treatment. British journal of ophthalmology. 1991;75(7):414-6.##
  20. Ingram RM, Gill LE, Goldacre MJ. Emmetropisation and accommodation in hypermetropic children before they show signs of squint-a preliminary analysis. Bulletin de la Société belge d'ophtalmologie. 1993;253:41-56.##
  21. Ingram RM, Gill LE, Lambert TW. Effect of spectacles on changes of spherical hypermetropia in infants who did, and did not, have strabismus. British journal of ophthalmology. 2000;84(3):324-6.##
  22. Mulvihill A, MacCann A, Flitcroft I, O'Keefe M. Outcome in refractive accommodative esotropia. British journal of ophthalmology. 2000;84(7):746-9.##
  23. Ingram RM, Gill LE, Lambert TW. Emmetropisation in normal and strabismic children and the associated changes of anisometropia. Strabismus. 2003;11(2):71-84.##
  24. Yang HK, Choi JY, Kim DH, Hwang J-M. Changes in Refractive Errors Related to Spectacle Correction of Hyperopia. 2014.##
  25. Park K-A, Kim S-A, Oh SY. Long-term changes in refractive error in patients with accommodative esotropia. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(11):2196-207. e1.##
  26. Smith Iii EL, Hung L-F. The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys. Vision research. 1999;39(8):1415-35.##
  27. Smith Iii EL. Spectacle lenses and emmetropization: the role of optical defocus in regulating ocular development. Optometry & Vision Science. 1998;75(6):388-98.##
  28. Hung L-F, Crawford MLJ, Smith EL. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nature medicine. 1995;1(8):761-5.##
  29. Biler ED, Üretmen Ö, Köse S. The effect of optical correction on refractive development in children with accommodative esotropia. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2010;14(4):305-10.##
  30. Atkinson J, Anker S, Bobier W, Braddick O, Durden K, Nardini M, et al. Normal emmetropization in infants with spectacle correction for hyperopia. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2000;41(12):3726-31.##
  31. Pratt-Johnson J, Tillson G. Management of Strabismus and Amblyopia. A Practical Guide. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc.; 1994. p. 106-22.##
  32. Lambert SR, Lynn M, Sramek J, Hutcheson KA. Clinical features predictive of successfully weaning from spectacles those children with accommodative esotropia. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2003;7(1):7-13.##
Volume 5, Issue 1
March and April 2016
Pages 60-67
  • Receive Date: 13 July 2015
  • Revise Date: 24 August 2015
  • Accept Date: 14 October 2015
  • First Publish Date: 20 March 2016