بررسی ارتباط بین راستای آناتومیکی اندام تحتانی و میزان زاویه کوادریسپس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری حرکات اصلاحی گروه طب ورزش دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه تهران

2 استاد تمام گروه طب ورزش دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه تهران

3 استادیار گروه طب ورزش دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

مقدمه و هدف
 تغییرات در راستای اندام تحتانی به عنوان یک ریسک فاکتور برای آسیب­های این ناحیه تلقی می شود که زاویه Q نیز از این عوامل است، لذا هدف تحقیق حاضر بررسی ارتباط و میزان اثرگذاری عوامل آناتومیکی راستای اندام تحتانی بر میزان زاویه Q بود.
مواد و روش ها
 تعداد 120 دانشجوی مرد دانشگاه تهران در تحقیق پیش رو شرکت کردند. راستای اندام تحتانی در غالب فاکتورهای: آنتی ورژن ران، چرخش داخلی و خارجی ران، ولگوس و وروس زانو، هایپر اکستنشن زانو، چرخش تیبیا، تیبیاوارا، و شاخص قوس کف پا مورد بررسی قرار گرفت.
یافته­ها
نتایج تحقیق حاضر نشان داد که متغیرهای شاخص قوس کف پایی، وروس و ولگوس زانو، آنتی ورژن ران و پیچش درشت نی دارای بیشترین تاثیر در پیش بینی مقدار زاویه Q هستند(05/0≥ (Pکه در این میان شاخص قوس کف پا، آنتی ورژن ران، پیچش درشت نی، وروس و والگوس زانو به ترتیب دارای بیشترین تاثیر بودند.
نتیجه گیری
نتایج تحقیق حاضر نشان داد که تغییر در راستای آناتومیکی اندام تحتانی می تواند بر میزان زاویه Q تاثیر گذار باشد که در میان متغیرهای مورد مطالعه، شاخص قوس کف به دلیل اثرگذاری بر هر سه نقطه تشکیل دهنده این زاویه دارای بیشترین تاثیر می باشد و با تغییر میزان این زاویه، فرد در معرض آسیب های مختلف در سگمان های اندام تحتانی قرار می گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Study of the Relationship between the Lower Extremity Anatomical Alignment and Q Angle

نویسندگان [English]

  • Esmaeil Mozafaripour 1
  • Reza Rajabi 2
  • Hooman Minoonejad 3
1 PhD Student, Department of Health & Sport Medicine, Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Health & Sport Medicine, Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, 3. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Health & Sport Medicine Exercises, Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Aim: Changes in lower extremity alignment are considered as a risk factor for the injuries in this area together with Q angle. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship and affecting anatomical factors of lower extremity alignment on the Q angle.
Materials and Methods: A total of 120 male students from Tehran University participated in the study and their lower extremity alignments were investigated in these factors: hip anteversion, internal and external rotation of the hip, valgus and varus of knee, hyperextension of the knee, tibia rotation, tibiavara, and arch index.
Results: The results showed that the variables of plantar arch index, varus and valgus of knee, hip anteversion, and tibial torsion had maximum effect on the predicted value of the Q angle (p≤0/05) and the most influence was found to be respectively related to plantar arch index, anteversion of hip, tibial torsion, and varus and valgus of knee.
Conclusion: The results showed that the changes in the lower extremity anatomical alignment can affect the amount of Q angle. Among the variables studied, the plantar arch index was noted to have the greatest impact due to the influence of the three-point constituent of this angle. Changes in this angle can put the person at the risk of various injuries in the segments of the lower limb.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Q angle
  • Lower extremity alignment
  • Lowers limb injuries

مراجع

  1. Powers CM, Chen P-Y, Reischl SF, Perry J. Comparison of foot pronation and lower extremity rotation in persons with and without patellofemoral pain. Foot & ankle international. 2002;23(7):634-40.##
  2. Loudon JK, Jenkins W, Loudon KL. The relationship between static posture and ACL injury in female athletes. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1996;24(2):91-7.##
  3. Hertel J, Dorfman JH, Braham RA. Lower extremity malalignments and anterior cruciate ligament injury history. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2004;3(4):220.##
  4. Kaneko M, Sakuraba K. Association between Femoral Anteversion and Lower Extremity Posture upon Single-leg Landing: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Journal of physical therapy science. 2013;25(10):1213.##
  5. Amraee D, Alizadeh M, Razi M, Yazdi H, Minoonejad H. Risk factors associated with noncontact injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament in male athletes. Minerva Ortopedica E Traumatologia. 2013;64(4):435-44.##
  6. Shultz SJ, Nguyen A-D, Levine BJ. The relationship between lower extremity alignment characteristics and anterior knee joint laxity. Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 2009;1(1):54-60.##
  7. Puckree T, Govender A, Govender K, Naidoo P. The quadriceps angle and the incidence of knee injury in Indian long-distance runners. South African Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009;19(1):9-11.##
  8. Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA, Dick RW, Garrett WE, et al. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2000;8(3):141-50.##
  9. Messier SP, Davis SE, Curl WW, Lowery RB, Pack RJ. Etiologic factors associated with patellofemoral pain in runners. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1991;23(9):1008-15.##
  10. Lankhorst NE, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Middelkoop M. Factors associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. British journal of sports medicine. 2012:bjsports-2011-090369.##
  11. Livingston L, Mandigo J. Bilateral within-subject Q angle asymmetry in young adult females and males. Biomedical sciences instrumentation. 1996;33:112-7.##
  12. Schulthies SS, Francis RS, Fisher AG, Van De Graaff KM. Does the Q angle reflect the force on the patella in the frontal plane? Physical therapy. 1;75(1):24-30.##
  13. Boling MC, Padua DA, Marshall SW, Guskiewicz K, Pyne S, Beutler A. A prospective investigation of biomechanical risk factors for patellofemoral pain syndrome the joint undertaking to monitor and prevent ACL injury (JUMP-ACL) cohort. The American journal of sports medicine. 2009;37(11):2108-16.##
  14. Krivickas LS. Anatomical factors associated with overuse sports injuries. Sports Medicine. 1997;24(2):132-46.##
  15. Sendur OF, Gurer G, Yildirim T, Ozturk E, Aydeniz A. Relationship of Q angle and joint hypermobility and Q angle values in different positions. Clinical rheumatology. 2006;25(3):304-8.##
  16. Emami M-J, Ghahramani M-H, Abdinejad F, Namazi H. Q-angle: an invaluable parameter for evaluation of anterior knee pain. Arch Iran Med. 2007;10(1):24-6.##
  17. Greene CC, Edwards TB, Wade MR, Carson EW. Reliability of the quadriceps angle measurement. The American journal of knee surgery. 2000;14(2):97-103.##
  18. Piva SR, Fitzgerald K, Irrgang JJ, Jones S, Hando BR, Browder DA, et al. Reliabilityof measures of impairments associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2006;7(1):33.##
  19. Loudon JK. Measurement of knee-joint-position sense in women with genu recurvatum. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2000;9(1):15-25.##
  20. Kwon O, Tuttle L, Commean P, Mueller M. Reliability and validity of measures of hammer toe deformity angle and tibial torsion. The Foot. 2009;19(3):149-55.##
  21. Lee SH, Chung CY, Park MS, Choi IH, Cho T-J. Tibial torsion in cerebral palsy: validity andreliability of measurement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2009;467(8):2098-104.##
  22. Lohmann KN, Rayhel HE, Schneiderwind WP, Danoff JV. Static Measurement of Tibia Vara Reliability and Effect of Lower Extremity Position. Physical Therapy. 1987;67(2):196-9.##
  23. Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. J Bone Joint Surg. 1987;69(3):426-28.##
  24. Page P, Frank C, Lardner R. Assessment and treatment of muscle imbalance: the Janda approach: Human Kinetics; 2010.##
  25. Patel K. Corrective Exercise: A Practical Approach: Routledge; 2014.##
  26. Daneshmandi H, Saki F, Shahheidari S, Khoori A. Lower extremity Malalignment and its linear relation with Q angle in female athletes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;15:3349-54.##
  27. FABRY G, MACEWEN GD, Shands Jr A. Torsion of the femur. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1973;55(8):1726-38.##
  28. Ruwe P, Gage JR, Ozonoff M, DeLuca P. Clinical determination of femoral anteversion. A comparison with established techniques. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1992;74(6):820-30.##
  29. Crane L. Femoral torsion and its relation to toeing-in and toeing-out. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1959;41(3):421-8.##
  30. Magee DJ. Orthopedic physical assessment: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.##
  31. Tönnis D, Heinecke A. Current Concepts Review-Acetabular and Femoral Anteversion: Relationship with Osteoarthritis of the Hip*. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1999;81(12):1747-70.##
  32. Powers CM. The influence of altered lower-extremity kinematics onpatellofemoral joint dysfunction: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2003;33(11):639-46.##
  33. Hvid I, Andersen LI. The quadriceps angle and its relation to femoral torsion. Acta Orthopaedica. 1982;53(4):577-9.##
  34. Nguyen A-D, Boling MC, Levine B, Shultz SJ. Relationships between lower extremity alignment and the quadriceps angle. Clinical journal of sport medicine: official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine. 2009;19(3):201.##

 

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی طب توانبخشی
دوره 5، شماره 4
آذر و دی 1395
صفحه 173-181

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 25 اردیبهشت 1394
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 11 آذر 1394
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 14 آذر 1394
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 دی 1395

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار