Survey of the Effects of Supervised vs Home-based Vestibular Rehabilitation in Patients with Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction Based on VOR Gain

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 Associated Professor. Department of Audiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences,

3 university of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences

Abstract

Background and Aim: Patients with dysfunction in the vestibular system suffer from substantial balance problems, which severely restrain their normal daily activities. One of the main treatment methods for these patients is vestibular rehabilitation. The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of vestibular rehabilitation program on VOR gain through the stimulation of different semicircular canals using vHIT.
Materials and Methods: The current cross-sectional study was performed on 42 patients with unilateral vestibular deficit. Half of the patients were randomly allocated to the home-based group who performed the vestibular rehabilitation program at home. The rest were assigned to the supervised group and received vestibular rehabilitation program under the supervision of a qualified clinician. The extents of VOR gain were compared both between groups and within groups, i.e. before and after vestibular rehabilitation program.
Results: Vestibular rehabilitation program enhanced the average VOR gain across both groups in the most semicircular canals (p < 0.05). Moreover, the supervised group, compared to the home-based group, showed higher VOR gain across the horizontal and posterior semicircular canals in the damaged side (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Performed by the patients at home, vestibular rehabilitation program could successfully reduce the symptoms of peripheral vestibular problems. However, this program was shown to be more efficient while performed under the supervision of an audiologist. A unique aspect of the present study is application of vHIT test for measuring the treatment efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation program.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Verdecchia DH, Mendoza M, Sanguineti F, Binetti AC. Outcomes after Vestibular Rehabilitation and Wii® Therapy in Patients with Chronic Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2014; 65(6):339-345.##
  2. Goddard JC, Fayad JN. Vestibular Neuritis. Otolaryngologic clinics of North America. 2011; 44:361-365.##
  3. Herdman S J, Blatt P, Schubert MC, Tusa RJ. Falls in patients with vestibular deficits. Am. J. Otol. 2000; 21:847–851.##
  4. Kao CL, Chen LK, Chern CM, Hsu LC, Chen CC, Hwang SJ. Rehabilitation outcome in home-based versus supervised exercise programs for chronically dizzy patients. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2010; 51:264-267.##
  5. Giray M, Kirazli Y, Karapolat H, Celebisoy N, Bilgen C, Kirazli T. Short-term effects of vestibular rehabilitation in patients with chronic unilateral vestibular dysfunction: a randomized controlled study. Arch Med Rehabil. 2009; 90:1325-31.##
  6. Cohen HS, Mimball KT. Increased independence and decreased vertigo after vestibular rehabilitation. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2003; 128:60–70.##
  7. Topuz O, Topuz B, Ardic FN, Sarhus M, Ogmen G, Ardi F. Efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation on chronic unilateral vestibular dysfunction. Clin. Rehabil. 2004; 18:76–83.##
  8. MacDougall HG, Weber KP, McGravie LA, Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS. The video head impulse test: diagnostic accuracy in peripheral vestibulopathy. Neurology. 2009; 73:1134-1141.##
  9. Meldrum D, Herdman S, Vance R, Murray D, Malone K, Duffy D, Glennon A, McConn-Walsh R. Effectiveness of conventional versus virtual reality-based balance exercises in vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular loss: results of a randomized controlled trial. Archieves of Phisical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2015;02-032.##
  10. Yardley L, Donovan-Hall M, Smith HE, Walsh BM, Mullee M, Bronstein AM. Effectiveness of primary care-based vestibular rehabilitation for chronic dizziness. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141: 598-605.##
  11. Horak FB, Jones-Rycewicz C, Black FO, Shumway-Cook A. Effects of vestibular rehabilitation on dizziness and imbalance. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992; 106:175-80.##
  12. Herdman SJ, Clendaniel RA, Mattox DE, Holliday MJ, NiparkoJK. Vestibular adaptation exercises and recovery: acute stage after acoustic neuroma resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995; 113:77-87.##
  13. Cohen HS, Kimball KT. Decreased ataxia and improved balanceafter vestibular rehabilitation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130:418-25.##
  14. Herdman SJ, Schubert MC, Das VE, Tusa RJ. Recovery of dynamic visual acuity in unilateral vestibular hypofunction. ArchOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 129:819-24.##
  15. Yardley L, Beech S, Zander L, Evans T, Weinman J. A random controlled trial of exercise therapy for dizziness and vertigo in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 1998; 48:1136-40.##
  16. Corna S, Nardone A, Prestinari A, Galante M, Grasso M, Schieppat M. Comparison of Cawthorne-Cooksey Exercises and Sinusoidal Support Surface Translations to Improve Balance in Patients with Unilateral Vestibular Deficit. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1173-1184.##
  17. Shepard NT, Telian SA, Smith-Wheelock M. Habituation and balance retraining therapy: a retrospective review. Neurol Clin. 1990; 8:459-75.##
  18. Miles FA, Eighmy BB. Long-term adaptive changes in primate vestibuloocular reflex. I. Behavioral observations. J Neurophysiol. 1980; 43:1406-25.##
Volume 6, Issue 2
July and August 2017
Pages 19-26
  • Receive Date: 13 February 2016
  • Revise Date: 29 April 2016
  • Accept Date: 24 May 2016
  • First Publish Date: 22 June 2017