Comparison of Plantar Pressure Distribution and Ground Reaction Force between Hydrodynamic Prefabricated Shoe and EVA Sport Shoe during Walking

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 Assistant professor of Sport Biomechanics,Faculty of Sport Sciences,University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Sports Sciences Research Institute of Iran (SSRII), Tehran, Iran

3 Master of Sciences in Sport Biomechanics from Azad University

Abstract

Background and Aim: The aim of the present study was comparison of plantar pressure distribution and ground reaction force during walking between prefabricated shoes with hydrodynamic mechanism and EVA sport shoes.
Materials and Methods: In the current study, 10 healthy male individuals participated. A special shoe with specific ways for liquid flow was made for the present study that was capable of reducing pressure from damping mechanism. Also, an EVA shoe was used for comparison as reference shoe. Ground reaction force and plantar pressure distribution were measured using Pedar insole system. Data analysis was performed using Pedar X software and in eight regions of foot.
Results: The results of the present study showed that the special shoe with hydrodynamic mechanism could effectively reduce load in rear foot, forefoot, and toe regions.
Conclusion: According to the results, damping effect of liquid shoe following impact force can effectively reduce the pressure and force in high risk regions of the foot.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Mueller MJ. Application of plantar pressure assessment in footwear and insert design. Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 1999 Dec;29(12):747-55.##
2. Knowles EA, Boulton AJ. Do people with diabetes wear their prescribed footwear?. Diabetic medicine. 1996 Dec;13(12):1064-8.##
3. Paton JS, Roberts A, Bruce GK, Marsden J. Patients’ Experience of therapeutic footwear whilst living at risk of neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration: an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Journal of foot and ankle research. 2014 Dec;7(1):16.##
4. Waaijman R, Keukenkamp R, de Haart M, Polomski WP, Nollet F, Bus SA. Adherence to wearing prescription custom-made footwear in patients with diabetes at high risk for plantar foot ulceration. Diabetes care. 2013 Feb 16:DC_121330.##
5. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Kimbriel HR, Nixon BP, Boulton AJ. Activity patterns of patients with diabetic foot ulceration: patients with active ulceration may not adhere to a standard pressure off-loading regimen. Diabetes care. 2003 Sep 1;26(9):2595-7. ##
6. Baker N, Leatherdale B. Audit of special shoes: are they being worn?. Diabetic Foot. 1999;2:100-4. ##
7. Bongaerts BW, Rathmann W, Heier M, Kowall B, Herder C, Stöckl D, Meisinger C, Ziegler D. Older subjects with diabetes and prediabetes are frequently unaware of having distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy: the KORA F4 study. Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec 19:DC_120744. ##
8. Dixon SJ, Waterworth C, Smith CV, House CM. Biomechanical analysis of running in military boots with new and degraded insoles. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2003 Mar;35(3):472-9. ##
9. Windle C, Gregory S, Dixon S. The shock attenuation characteristics of four different insoles when worn in a military boot during running and marching. Gait & posture. 1999 Mar 1;9(1):31-7. ##
10. Birke JA, Foto JG, Pfiefer LA. Effect of orthosis material hardness on walking pressure in high-risk diabetes patients. JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 1999 Apr 1;11(2):43-6. ##
11. Farjad-Pezeshk A, Sadeghi H, Farzadi M. Comparison of Plantar Pressure Distribution and Vertical Ground Reaction Force between Dominant and None-Dominant Limb in Healthy Subjects Using Principle Component Analysis (PCA) Technique. jrehab. 2013; 14 (1) :91-102 ##
Volume 8, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
April 2019
Pages 140-147
  • Receive Date: 26 September 2018
  • Revise Date: 01 February 2019
  • Accept Date: 11 March 2019
  • First Publish Date: 21 March 2019