Effect of anti-reflective, photochromic anti-reflective and CR-39 lenses on disability glare

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 1. Phd of Optometry. Faculty of Rehabilitation Science. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

2 2. OD of Optometry. Faculty of Rehabilitation Science. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

3 3. MSc of Biostatistics. Faculty of Rehabilitation Science. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

4 4. Student Research Committee. MSc of Optometry. Faculty of Rehabilitation Science. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aim: Some methods are proposed in the literature to decrease disability glare. In this study the effect of CR-39, antireflective and photochromic antireflective lenses on disability glare was measured in simple myopic, simple astigmatism and compound myopic astigmatic participants. The aim of the study was to find a lens which decreases the disability glare more than others.
Materials and Methods: The quasi experimental repeated measure study was designed to compare the effect of the CR-39, antireflective and photochromic antireflective lenses on disability glare. This study was performed on 34 participants .Disability glare was measured with car head light effect on contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic condition.
Results: There was no statistical difference in contrast sensitivity between the lenses except for 18 Cycle/Degree frequencies under mesopic condition in which CR-39 lens show better result than other lenses.
Conclusion: This study showed that CR-39 lenses, anti -reflective and photochromic anti-reflective lenses have identical effect on disability glare in suprathereshold condition, and there is not any reason to prescribe anti-reflective and photochromic lens to decrease disability glare.

Keywords


1.   Benjamin WJ, Borish IM. Borish’s Clinical Refraction. Elsevier Science Health Science Division; 2006. 1694 p. ##
2.   Aslam TM, Haider D, Murray IJ. Principles of disability glare measurement: an ophthalmological perspective. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 2007;85(4):354–60. ##
3.   Puell MC, Benítez-del-Castillo JM, Martínez-de-la-Casa J, Sánchez-Ramos C, Vico E, Pérez-Carrasco MJ, et al. Contrast sensitivity and disability glare in patients with dry eye. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Aug;84(4):527–31. ##
4.   Atchison DA, Smith G. Optics of Teh Human Eyes. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2000. 296 p. ##
5.   Franssen L, Coppens JE, Berg TJTP van den. Compensation Comparison Method for Assessment of Retinal Straylight. IOVS. 2006 Jan 2;47(2):768–76.##
6.   Lee HK, Choe CM, Ma KT, Kim EK. Measurement of contrast sensitivity and glare under mesopic and photopic conditions following wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK surgery. Journal of refractive surgery. 22(7):647–55. ##
7.   Kojima T, Hasegawa A, Hara S, Horai R, Yoshida Y, Nakamura T, et al. Quantitative evaluation of night vision and correlation of refractive and topographical parameters with glare after orthokeratology. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct 1;249(10):1519–26. ##
8.   Lee JE, Stein JJ, Prevor MB, Seiple WH, Holopigian K, Greenstein VC, et al. Effect of variable tinted spectacle lenses on visual performance in control subjects. CLAO J. 2002 Apr;28(2):80–2. ##
9.   Gray R, Perkins SA, Suryakumar R, Neuman B, Maxwell WA. Reduced effect of glare disability on driving performance in patients with blue light–filtering intraocular lenses. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2011 Jan;37(1):38–44. ##
10.    Naidu S, Lee JE, Holopigian K, Seiple WH, Greenstein VC, Stenson SM. The effect of variably tinted spectacle lenses on visual performance in cataract subjects. Eye Contact Lens. 2003 Jan;29(1):17–20. ##
11.    Wang H, Wang J, Fan W, Wang W. Comparison of photochromic, yellow, and clear intraocular lenses in human eyes under photopic and mesopic lighting conditions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Dec;36(12):2080–6. ##
12.    Bachman WG, Weaver JL. Comparison between anti-reflection-coated and uncoated spectacle lenses for presbyopic highway patrol troopers. J Am Optom Assoc. 1999 Feb;70(2):103–9. ##
13.    Mashige KP, Thathane NP, Kader F, Nyandoro GD, Sultan AA. The effect of anti-reflection coating on glare threshold and recovery under scotopic conditions. [cited 2013 Jan 7]; Available from: http://www.saoptometrist.co.za/KP%20Mashige%20Et%20al_The%20effect%20of%20anti-reflection%20coating%20on%20glare%20threshold%20and%20recovery%20under%20scotopic%20conditions.pdf##
14.    Ross J, Bradley A. Visual performance and patient preference: a comparison of anti-reflection coated and uncoated spectacle lenses. J Am Optom Assoc. 1997 Jun;68(6):361–6. ##
15.    Steen R, Whitaker D, Elliott DB, Wild JM. Effect of filters on disability glare. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1993 Oct;13(4):371–6. ##
16.    Eperjesi F, Fowler CW, Evans BJW. Do tinted lenses or filters improve visual performance in low vision? A review of the literature. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002 Jan;22(1):68–77. ##
17.    Citek K. Anti-reflective coatings reflect ultraviolet radiation. Optometry - Journal of the American Optometric Association. 2008 Mar;79(3):143–8. ##
18.    Jc T, Dj S, Gb A. Comparison of methods to assess visual impairment from glare and light scattering with posterior capsule opacification. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 1998 Dec;24(12):1626. ##
19.    Nischler C, Michael R, Wintersteller C, Marvan P, Rijn LJ van, Coppens JE, et al. Iris color and visual functions. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jan 1;251(1):195–202. ##
20.    Mashige KP. Night vision and glare vision thresholds and recovery time in myopic and hyperopic eyes. [cited 2013 Jan 7]; Available from: http://www.saoptometrist.co.za/MASHIGE_SEPT10.pdf##
 
 
Volume 3, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
January and February 2015
Pages 10-16
  • Receive Date: 04 May 2014
  • Revise Date: 04 August 2014
  • Accept Date: 21 November 2014
  • First Publish Date: 22 December 2014