Relationship between Frequency of Compensatory Misarticulation with Timing of Primary Palatal Surgery and Cleft Type in 3-7 Year-Old Children with Cleft Palate

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 Craniofacial Anomalies and Cleft Palate Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

2 BSc in Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran., Isfahan, Iran.

3 BSc in Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

4 "Craniofacical Anomalies and Cleft Palate research center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran"

Abstract

Background and Aim: Despite the relatively long history of palatal surgery, little consensus has been reached regarding the best surgical techniques, and even less regarding optimal timing. There are still no standard protocols to address the issues of ideal timing for cleft palate repair to attain optimal speech and to avoid abnormal maxillofacial growth after repair. Otherwise, there are various types of cleft of the primary and secondary palate and researches indicate that the extent and type of cleft, surgical techniques, and timing of surgical and behavioral management might impress the frequency and type of speech errors. The present study was conducted to examine the impact of the time of primary palatal surgery and cleft type on compensatory misarticulation in 3-7 years old children with cleft palate.
Materials and Methods: In the present retrospective descriptive-analytic study. A total of 175 children, aged 3-7 years, with repaired cleft palate were chosen from Isfahan Cleft palate and Craniofacial Team. The case files were chosen based on the entrance criteria and then the personal data and speech assessment forms were filled. Information about the cleft type and timing of primary palatal surgery was collected from children’ files. Data was analyzed using analytic statistics in SPSS, version 16.
Results: Chi-square analyses revealed no significant relationship between dependent variable of the frequency of preschoolers with cleft palate who produced compensatory misarticulation and the independent variables of cleft type and age of primary palatal surgery.
Conclusion: In the present study, the age range was wide, and the extent of the cleft was unclear. Additional research is needed to determine if there are variables (such as type and time of early intervention program) that might have masked the influence of timing of primary surgery and cleft type.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Kummer A. Cleft palate and craniofacial anomalies: Effects on speech and resonance. Third ed. United States of America: CENGAGE Learning; 2014.##
  2. Hardin-Jones MA, Jones DL. Speech production of preschoolers with cleft palate. The cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2005; 42(1):7-13. ##
  3.  Peterson-Falzone SJ, Trost-Cardamon JE, Karnell Mp, Hardin-Jones MA. The clinician’s guide to treating cleft palate speech. First ed. United States of America: Mosby Elsevier; 2006. ##
  4. Howard S, Lohmander A. Cleft Palate Speech: Assessment and intervention. First ed. UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. ##
  5. Klinto K, Svensson H, Elander A,  Lohmander A. Speech and Phonology in Swedish- Speaking 3-year-olds with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate following different methods for primary palatal surgery. The cleft palate- craniofacial journal. 2014; 52(3):274-82. ##
  6. Farronato G, Kaiyte L, Giannin L, Galbiat G, Maspero C. How various surgical protocols of the unilateral cleft lip and palate influence the facial growth and possible orthodontic problem? Which is the best timing of lip, palate and alveolus repair? Literature review. Stomatologija. 2014; 16(2):53-60. ##
  7. Willadsen E. Influence of timing of hard palate repair in a two-stage procedure on early speech development in Danish children with cleft palate. The cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2012; 49(5):574-95. ##
  8. Murthy J, Sendhilnathan S, Hussain SA. Speech outcome fallowing late primary palate repair. The cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2010; 47(2):156-61. ##
  9. Chapman KL, Hardin-Jones MA, Goldstein A, Ann Halter K, Havlik, Schulte J, Timing of palatal surgery and speech outcome. Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2008; 45(3):297-308. ##
  10. Rezaei P, Sadeghi S, Samani M, Yazdi M, Derakhshande F, Memarzade M. The relationship between timing of primary palatal surgery, cleft type and hypernasality in 3-6 years old children with cleft palate. Journal of research in rehabilitation sciences. 2014; 10(2):228-238.[In Persian] ##
  11. Amirian A, Derakhshandeh F, Salehi A, Soleimani B. Evaluating intra-and inter-rater reliability” Cleft palate speech assessment test based on universal parameters system- in Persian”. Master science thesis in medical university of Isfahan. 2010.[In Persian] ##
  12. Farzaneh F, Becker M, Peterson AM, Svensson H. Speech results in adult Swedish patients born with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Department of plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2008; 42(1):7-13##
  13. Ruiter JS, Korsten-Meijer AGW, Goorhuis-Brouwer SM. Communicative abilities in toddlers and in early school age children with cleft palate. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2009; 73:693-8. ##
  14. Persson Ch, Lohmander A, Elander A. Speech in children with an isolated: A longitudinal perspective. Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2006; 43(3):295-309. ##
  15. Persson Ch, Elander A, Lohmander A, Soderpalm E. Speech outcome in isolated cleft palate: Impact of cleft Extent and Additional Malformation. Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2002; 39(4):397-408##
  16. Bunnegar F, Lohmander A. A cross- sectional study of speech in 10- year- old children with cleft palate: Results and issues of rater reliability. Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2007; 44(1):33-41. ##
  17. Rullo R, Maggio D Dio, Festa V.M, Mazzarella N. Speech assessment in cleft palate patients: A descriptive study. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2009; 73:641-4. ##
  18. Hardin-Jones M, Chapman L, Schulte J. The impact of cleft type on early vocal development in babies with cleft palate. Cleft palate-craniofacial journal. 2003; 4(5):453-9. ##
  19. Zanzi M, Cherpillod J, Hohfild J. Phonetic and otological results after early palate closure in 18 consecutive children presenting with cleft lip and palate. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2002; 66:131-7. ##
Volume 6, Issue 3
September and October 2017
Pages 77-83
  • Receive Date: 22 June 2016
  • Revise Date: 24 August 2016
  • Accept Date: 24 September 2016
  • First Publish Date: 23 September 2017