Relationships between Maturity and Flexibility in School-Aged Children

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Sports Sciences, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Kish, Iran

2 PhD, Professor, Department of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Sports Sciences, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Kish, Iran

Abstract

Background and Aims: Maturity involves physical and psychological changes that happen sequentially and maturity status should be considered in all the studies that aim to assess the physiological process in children. Flexibility is one of the most important indicators of physical fitness in children that are likely to be affected by maturity. The aim of the present research was to examine the relationship between maturity and flexibility in school-aged boys and girls.
Materials and Methods: The statistical sample included 700 school-aged, 9-18 year old, boys and girls from Shahrekord city categorized into 10 groups of 35 girls and 10 groups of 35 boys. To evaluate maturity, predictive maturity offset, and to assess flexibility, sit and reach test and knee to wall test were used. For data analysis, the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test was used (P≤0.05).
Results: Spearman correlation test showed a significant correlation between predictive maturity offset and sit and reach test (r=0.162, P<0.001) and knee to wall test (r=/280, P<0.001). Also, there was a significant correlation between maturity offset and sit and reach test in boys (r=0.368, P<0.001) and girls (r=-0.162, P<0.01), and knee to wall test in boys (r=0.284, P<0.001) and girls (r=0.302, P<0.001).
Conclusion: The findings showed that there was a significant correlation between predictive maturity offset and sit and reach test and knee to wall test. Therefore, realizing what changes may occur to flexibility on the maturation process can be considered as a goal for planning exercises; further research can be conducted on the causes of these differences.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1.         Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones AD, Bailey DA, et al. An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(4):689-94.##
2.         Kozieł SM, Malina RM. Modified maturity offset prediction equations: Validation in independent longitudinal samples of boys and girls. Sports Med. 2018;48(1):221-36. ##
3.         Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, maturation, and physical activity: Human kinetics; 2004. ##
4.         Malina RM, Ribeiro B, Aroso J, et al. Characteristics of youth soccer players 13-15 years classified by skill level. Br J Sports Med. 2007. ##
5.         Gastin PB, Bennett G, Cook J. Biological maturity influences running performance in junior Australian football. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16(2):140-5. ##
6.         Ayers SF, Sariscsany MJ. Physical education for lifelong fitness: the physical best teacher's guide: Human Kinetics; 2011. ##
7.         Nagarwal A, Zutshi K, Ram C, et al. Improvement of hamstring flexibility: A comparison between two PNF stretching techniques. International journal of sports science and engineering. 2010;4(1):25-33. ##
8.         Martins R, Abade E, Viana JL, et al. The influence of height on a 10 week flexibility program applied in physical education classes. Journal of Sport Pedagogy and Research. 2017;3(2):27-31. ##
9.         Feldman D, Shrier I, Rossignol M, et al. Adolescent growth is not associated with changes in flexibility. Clinical journal of sport medicine: official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine. 1999;9(1):24-9. ##
10.       Lamari N, Marino LC, Cordeiro JA, et al. Trunk anterior flexibility in adolescents after height growth speed peak. Acta Ortopedica Brasileira. 2007;15(1):25-9. ##
11.       Youdas JW, Krause DA, Hollman JH, et al. The influence of gender and age on hamstring muscle length in healthy adults. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2005;35(4):246-52. ##
12.       Rodríguez P, Santonja F, López-Miñarro P, et al. Effect of physical education stretching programme on sit-and-reach score in schoolchildren. Science & Sports. 2008;23(3-4):170-5. ##
13.       Ramos Espada D, González Montesinos J, Mora Vicente J. Evolution of the articular range in primary and secondary school. Rev Int Med Cienc Act Fís Deporte. 2007;7(26):144-57. ##
14.       Lloyd RS, Oliver JL, Radnor JM, et al. Relationships between functional movement screen scores, maturation and physical performance in young soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(1):11-9. ##
15.       Lacy AC, Williams SM. Measurement and evaluation in physical education and exercise science: Routledge; 2018. ##
16.       Gabbe BJ, Bennell KL, Wajswelner H, et al. Reliability of common lower extremity musculoskeletal screening tests. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2004;5(2):90-7. ##
17.       Konor MM, Morton S, Eckerson JM, et al. Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2012;7(3):279. ##
18.       Valdivia OD, Ortega FZ, Rodríguez JJA, et al. Changes in flexibility according to gender and educational stage. Apunts: Medicina de l'esport. 2009;44(161):10-7. ##
19.       Brodersen A, Pedersen B, Reimers J. Incidence of complaints about heel-, knee-and back-related discomfort among Danish children, possible relation to short muscles. Ugeskrift for laeger. 1994;156(15):2243-5. ##
20.       Harreby M, Nygaard B, Jessen T, et al. Risk factors for low back pain in a cohort of 1389 Danish school children: an epidemiologic study. European Spine Journal. 1999;8(6):444-50. ##
21.       Wahlstedt C, Rasmussen-Barr E. Anterior cruciate ligament injury and ankle dorsiflexion. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015;23(11):3202-7. ##
The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume 9, Issue 3
November 2020
Pages 27-38

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 23 April 2019
  • Revise Date: 08 September 2019
  • Accept Date: 03 November 2019
  • First Publish Date: 22 September 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics