Comparison of Diagnostic Stability of Some Sacroiliac Joint Tests between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals

Document Type : Original article

Authors

1 Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences

2 Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran university of Medical Sciences Iranian Center of Excellence in Physiotherapy

3 Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences Iranian Center of Excellence in Physiotherapy

Abstract

Background and Aim: The reliability of manual tests of the Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) is important in that they are frequently used in the assessment of this region for which there is no successful paraclinical exam. The aim of the present study was to measure the diagnostic stability of some of the SIJ manual tests as well as to compare it between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.
Materials and Methods: A total of 17 examiners assessed the symmetry of the position of bilateral ILAs and PSISs in prone lying, PSISs in standing as well as the motion of PSISs in standing flexion test on two individuals (one symptomatic and one asymptomatic). The diagnostic stability of the landmarks was computed using X2 and Bayes factor. Examiners were blinded about participants' symptoms.
Results: The results revealed that X2 and Bayes factor were 4.76 and 12.28 for ILAs, 9.94 and 277.52 for PSISs in prone lying, and 9.30 and 241.15 for PSISs in standing and standing flexion test, respectively.
Conclusion: The diagnostic stability of the PSIS in prone lying was the highest and the diagnostic stability of the ILA was the lowest. The diagnostic stability of symptomatic participant was higher than that of the asymptomatic participant. Accordingly, the probability of false postive outcome of the tests is high in asymptomatic individual. Therefore, prior to static palpation tests in the physical examination, it is better to perform pain provocation tests in order to confirm the existence of the SIJ dysfunction.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ehrlich, G.E., Low back pain. Bull World Health Organ, 2003. 81(9): p. 671-6.##
  2. Cohen, S.P., Y. Chen, and N.J. Neufeld, Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother, 2013. 13(1): p. 99-116. .##
  3. Schwarzer, A.C., C.N. Aprill, and N. Bogduk, The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1995. 20(1): p. 31-7. .##
  4. van der Wurff, P., R.H. Hagmeijer, and W. Meyne, Clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. A systematic methodological review. Part 1: Reliability. Man Ther, 2000. 5(1): p. 30-6. ##
  5. Dreyfuss, P., et al., The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996. 21(22): p. 2594-602. ##
  6. Slipman, C.W., et al., The value of radionuclide imaging in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1996. 21(19): p. 2251-4. ##
  7. Tullberg, T., et al., Manipulation does not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998. 23(10): p. 1124-8; discussion 1129. ##
  8. Toussaint, R., et al., Sacroiliac dysfunction in construction workers. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 1999. 22(3): p. 134-8. ##
  9. Chaitow, L., Palpation and Assessment Skills: Assessment Through Touch. 2010(3rd ed): p. 330. ##
  10. Stovall, B.A. and S. Kumar, Reliability of bony anatomic landmark asymmetry assessment in the lumbopelvic region: application to osteopathic medical education. J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2010. 110(11): p. 667-74. ##
  11. Vleeming, A., et al., European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J, 2008. 17(6): p. 794-819. ##
  12. Arab, A.M., et al., Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint. Man Ther, 2009. 14(2): p. 213-21. ##
  13. Riddle, D.L. and J.K. Freburger, Evaluation of the presence of sacroiliac joint region dysfunction using a combination of tests: a multicenter intertester reliability study. Phys Ther, 2002. 82(8): p. 772-81. ##
  14. Tong, H.C., et al., Interexaminer reliability of three methods of combining test results to determine side of sacral restriction, sacral base position, and innominate bone position. J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2006. 106(8): p. 464-8. ##
  15. Kmita, A. and N.P. Lucas, Reliability of physical examination to assess asymmetry of anatomical landmarks indicative of pelvic somatic dysfunction in subjects with and without low back pain. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 2008. 11(1): p. 16-25. ##
  16. Fryer, G., H.C. McPherson, and P. O'Keefe, The effect of training on the inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of the seated flexion test and assessment of pelvic anatomical landmarks with
  17. O'Haire, C. and P. Gibbons, Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study. Man Ther, 2000. 5(1): p. 13-20. ##
  18. Holmgren, U. and K. Waling, Inter-examiner reliability of four static palpation tests used for assessing pelvic dysfunction. Man Ther, 2008. 13(1): p. 50-6. ##
  19. Levin, U., L. Nilsson-Wikmar, and C.H. Stenstrom, Variability within and between evaluations of sacroiliac pain with the use of distraction testing. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 2005. 28(9): p. 688-95. ##
  20. Stovall, B.A., S. Bae, and S. Kumar, Anterior superior iliac spine asymmetry assessment on a novel pelvic model: an investigation of accuracy and reliability. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 2010. 33(5): p. 378-85. ##
  21. Levin, U., et al., Reproducibility of manual pressure force on provocation of the sacroiliac joint. ##
  22. DeStefano, L.A., Greenman’s principles of manual medicine. 2011. ##
  23. Levin, U. and C.H. Stenstrom, Force and time recording for validating the sacroiliac distraction test. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2003. 18(9): p. 821-6. ##
  24. Chaitow, L., The ARTT of palpation? J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2012. 16(2): p. 129-31. ##
Volume 7, Issue 1
March and April 2018
Pages 183-192
  • Receive Date: 17 November 2016
  • Revise Date: 02 December 2016
  • Accept Date: 05 November 2017
  • First Publish Date: 21 March 2018