ترجمه، تطابق فرهنگی، روایی و اعتبار یک ابزار: عوامل موثر بر تصمیم گیری محقق

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترا، گروه کاردرمانی، دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، مرکز تحقیقات توانبخشی اعصاب اطفال، گروه کاردرمانی، دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه و اهداف
سنجش بخش مهمی از فرآیند ارزیابی، برنامه ریزی درمان و مداخله می­باشد و اجرای این فرآیند نیازمند دسترسی به ابزارهای مناسب است. طراحی و ساخت ابزار مسیری زمانبر و پر هزینه است، بنابراین ترجمه و استفاده از ابزارهای طراحی شده، به طور کامل نزدیک به صرفه به نظر می­رسد. اما اجرای فرآیند ترجمه و بررسی روایی و اعتبار ابزار با توجه به شرایط متفاوت است و عواملی بر آن تاثیرگزار است. در این مقاله مروری سعی بر معرفی عوامل تاثیرگزار بر تصمیم گیری محقق در انتخاب شیوه ترجمه و روایی و اعتبار شده است.
مواد و روشها
با توجه به هدف این پژوهش، منابع مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند تا عوامل اثرگذار  بر تصمیم گیری محقق مشخص شوند. پایگاه های داده های Google scholar, Pub Med, ProQuest, Elsevier  و OT seeker با کلید واژه هایtranslation, validity, reliability, cross-cultural adaptation, methodology, assessment, psychometric properties به گونه ای سازمان یافته جستجو شد. مقالات تا تاریخ مارچ 2014 جستجو شدند.
یافته ها
فرآیند ترجمه با توجه به تغییر زبان و فرهنگ تغییر می­نماید. عوامل موثر بر تصمیم گیری محقق در زمینه روش روایی و اعتبار با توجه به ابزاری که قرار است استفاده شود، بافتاری که ابزار قرار است در آن مورد استفاده قرار گیرد، روند اجرای تحقیق روایی و اعتبار و منابع مرتبط با آن تغییر می­کند.
نتیجه گیری
از مهمترین عوامل اثرگزار بر تصمیم گیری محقق می­توان به دسترسی به مترجمین و متخصصین، هدف ابزار، دسترسی به ابزارهای مشابه، دسترسی به نمونه کافی و محدودیت زمانی تحقیق اشاره نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Translation, cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of a test: Factors influencing researcher decisions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Nobakht 1
  • Hossein Sourtigi 1
  • Mehdi Rassafiani 2
1 PhD Candidate, Occupational Therapy Department, University of Social Welfare And Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Associated Professor, Occupational Therapy Department, University of Social Welfare And Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and aim: Assessment is an important part of the evaluation process, treatment planning, and intervention and this process requires the availability of suitable tools. Developing an assessment tool is an expensive and time-consuming process. It seems quite affordable to translate and use the existing tools. Translation, validity, and reliability process is different for various tools due to the different factors influencing the process. In the present review article, factors contributing to the researchers’ decision to choose the method of translation, validity and reliability have been discussed.
Materials and Methods: Literature was reviewed to identify factors contributing to the researchers’ decision-making. Google scholar, Pub Med, ProQuest, Elsevier, and OT seeker were searched. The combinations of the key words including validity, reliability, translation, cross-cultural adaptation, methodology, assessment, and psychometric properties were used. The search was limited to the articles published before March 2014.
Result: Translation processes change by using a tool in different language and culture. Factors contributing to the researcher's decision-making are different in the field of reliability and validity due to the assessment tool, context of the target population, the process, and resources of the research.
Conclusion: Access to translators and professionals, purpose of the assessment tool, access to the tools with the same context in the target language, and access to the target sample appear to be the most important factors contributing to the researchers’ decision-making.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Translation
  • Cultural adaptation
  • Validity
  • Reliability

مراجع

  1. Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process (3rd Edition). American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2014;68(Supplement_1):S1-S48.##
  2. Schell BA GG, Scaffa M, Cohn ES. Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.##
  3. Carter R LJ, Domholdt E. Rehabilitation research: principles and applications: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.##
  4. Fawcett AJL. The Importance of Accurate Assessment and Outcome Measurement.  Principles of assessment and outcome measurement for occupational therapists and physiotherapists: theory, skills and application: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. p. 16-44.##
  5. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. The American journal of medicine. 2006;119(2):166. e7-. e16.##
  6.  Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1993;46(12):1417-32.##
  7. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.##
  8. Lohrer H, Nauck T. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the VISA-P questionnaire for German-speaking patients with patellar tendinopathy. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2011;41(3):180-90.##
  9. Haroz EE, Bass JK, Lee C, Murray LK, Robinson C, Bolton P. Adaptation and testing of psychosocial assessment instruments for cross-cultural use: an example from the Thailand Burma border. BMC Psychology. 2014;2(1):31.##
  10. Borsa JC, Damásio BF, Bandeira DR. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto). 2012;22(53):423-32.##
  11. Van Widenfelt BM, Treffers PD, De Beurs E, Siebelink BM, Koudijs E. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clinical child and family psychology review. 2005;8(2):135-47.##
  12. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, Leplège A, Sullivan M, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA project approach. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1998;51(11):913-23.##
  13. Davis E DM, Waters E, Boyd R, Reddihough D, Mackinnon A, Graham HK. Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adolescents (CP QOL-Teen) Manual: Melbourne: University of Melbourne; 2013.##
  14. Conti MA, Latorre MdRDd, Hearst N, Segurado A. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation and reliability of the Body Area Scale for Brazilian adolescents. Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2009;25(10):2179-86.##
  15. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee‐Lorenz A, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient‐Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in health. 2005;8(2):94-104.##
  16. Tuthill EL, Butler LM, McGrath JM, Cusson RM, Makiwane GN, Gable RK, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of instruments assessing breastfeeding determinants: a multi-step approach. International breastfeeding journal. 2014;9(1):16.##
  17. Ware Jr JE, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1998;51(11):945-52.##
  18. Gandek B, Ware Jr JE. Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA project approach. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1998;51(11):953-9.##
  19. Craig C, Marshall A, Sjöström M, Bauman A, Booth M, Ainsworth B, et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381-96.##
  20. Holtmann G, Chassany O, Devault K, Schmitt H, Gebauer U, Doerfler H, et al. International validation of a health‐related quality of life questionnaire in patients with erosive gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease. Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. 2009;29(6):615-25.##
  21. Cuesta-Vargas AI, Gabel PC. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the upper limb functional index. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):126.##
  22. Gjersing L, Caplehorn JR, Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC medical research methodology. 2010;10(1):13.##
  23. Fawcett AJL. validity and clinical utility Principles of assessment and outcome measurement for occupational therapists and physiotherapists: theory, skills and application: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. p. 170-91.##
  24. Nobakht Z, Rassafiani M, Rezasoltani P. Validity and reliability of Persian version of Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF) in children with cerebral palsy. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2011;9(13):3-10.##
  25. Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1998;51(11):1037-44.##
  26.     Riyahi A, Rassafiani M, AkbarFahimi N, Sahaf R, Yazdani F. Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the manual ability classification system for children with cerebral palsy. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2013;20(1):19-24.##
  27.   Riahi A, Rassafiani M, Binesh M. The Cross-Cultural Validation and Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability of the Persian Translation of Parent Version of the Gross Motor Function Classification System for Children with Cerebral Palsy. Journal of Rehabilitation. 2013;13(5):25-30.##
  28.    Angst F, Goldhahn J, Pap G, Mannion A, Roach K, Siebertz D, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the German Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Rheumatology. 2007;46(1):87-92.##
  29.    Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Pistorio A, Malattia C, Cavuto S, Gado-West L, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) in 32 countries. Review of the general methodology. Clinical and experimental rheumatology. 2000;19(4 Suppl 23):S1-9.##
  30.    AkbarFahimi N, Rassafiani M, Soleimani F, Vameghi R, Kazemnejad A, Nobakht Z. Validity and reliability of Farsi version of cerebral palsy-quality of life questionnaire. Journal of Rehabilitation. 2013;13(5):73-83.##
  31.  SOLEIMANI F, VAMEGHI MD R, KAZEMNEJAD A, AKBAR FAHIMI N, NOBAKHT Z, RASSAFIANI* M. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children2015.##
دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی طب توانبخشی
دوره 4، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 4
آذر و دی 1394
صفحه 173-183

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 03 اسفند 1393
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 10 خرداد 1394
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 05 شهریور 1394
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 دی 1394

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار