نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار بیومکانیک ورزشی دانشکده علوم ورزشی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
2 استاد دانشکده تربیت بدنی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
3 استاد گروه فیزیوتراپی دانشگاه توانبخشی ایران، تهران، ایران
4 دانشیار گروه طب ورزشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران و مرکز تحقیقات پزشکی ورزشی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Background and Aims: Various jump-landing tasks, as fundamental sport skills, have a significant role in athletic achievements. Injury to the lower limb is prevalent in athletes engaged in jump-landing activities. Therefore, the study of biomechanics of landing is an important aspect to address in the development of preventive and training strategies. The purpose of the present study was to compare neuromuscular activity pattern of lower extremity during various jump-landing tasks in active young females.
Materials and Methods: In the present quasi-experimental study, nine healthy active women volunteered to participate (age: 21.2 ± 2.7 years, height: 1.68 ± 0.5 m, weight: 63.15 ± 7.73 kg, and fat percent: 25.2 ±4.1). The onset time of wave prior to initial contact and maximum RMS over 150 ms pre-landing and 150 ms post-landing for Vastus Lateralis (VL), Lateral Hamstring (LH), Medial Hamstring (MH) and Lateral Gastrocnemious (LG), in Drop-landing, Jump-landing, and countermovement jump tasks were calculated and then normalized to the peak RMS amplitude of MVIC and reported as percentage of it. Repeated measure ANOVA was used to compare amplitude of muscle activity in different tasks, and dependent t-test was used to compare the mean amplitude and onset time of muscle activity between pre and post contact.
Results: The post-impact activation of LH in countermovement jump was significantly different for different jumps and landings. VL activities in all the three tasks and for LH in drop jump and drop landing were significantly different between pre- and post-contact. No significant difference was observed in the onset of muscle activity prior to impact in the three tasks.
Conclusion: Based on the results, neuromuscular activity was different in various jump-landing tasks. The differences in the demands of tasks can change the lower extremity muscle activity patterns, especially after contact. Therefore, using the most common tasks in sport, especially jump-landing and countermovement jump, instead of jump landing tasks, is essential in the study of landing biomechanics.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
10. Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ, Nguyen A. 2010. Joint laxity is related to lower extremity energetics during drop jump landing. Med Sci Sport Exerc 42(4):771-780. ##
11. Leukel C, Gollhofer A, Keller M, Taube W. 2008. Phase and task specific modulation of soleuse H-reflex during drop jumps and landings. Exp Br Res 190 (1):71-79.##
12. Tillman MD, Criss RM, Brunt D, Hass CJ. 2004. Landing constraints influence ground reaction forces and lower extremity EMG in female volleyball players. J Appl Biomech; 20(1):36-50.##
13. Shultz SJ, Nguyen AD, Leonard MD. 2009. Thigh strength and activation as predictors of knee biomechanics during a drop jump task. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 33(4):923-931.##
14. Affifi M, Hinrichs RN. 2012. A mechanics comparison between landing from a countermovement jump and landing from stepping off a box. J App Biomech, 28(1): 1-9 ##
15. Padua D A, Marshal S A, Boling M C. 2009. The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a valid and reliable clinical assessment tool of jump landing biomechanics: The JUMP-ACL study. Am J of Sports Med, 37(10):1996-2002. ##
16. Ambegaonkar AP, Shultz JA, Perrin DH. 2011. A subsequent movement alters lower extremity muscle activity and kinetics in drop jumps vs drop landings. J Strength and Conditioning, 25(10):2781-89.##
17. Peretto A. 2005. Anatomical guide for the electromyographer: the limbs and trunks. Springfield, IL:Charles C Thomas, P:194-228.##
18. Hislop HJ, Montgomery J. Daniels and Worthingham's Muscle Testing: Techniques of Manual Examination. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1995. pp. 207–208.##
19. Wojtys EM, Huston LJ, Schock HL, Boylan JP, Ashton-Miller JA. 2003. Gender differences in muscular protection of knee in torsion in size-mached athletes. The Journal of bone and joint surgery, 85 (5): 782-789.##
20. Besier TF, Lloyd DG, Ackland TR. 2003. Muscle activation strategies at the knee during running and cutting maneuvers. Med Sci Sport Exerc, 35(1): 119-127.##
21. Cowling EJ, Steele JR. 2001. Is lower limb muscle synchrony during landing affected by gender? Implications for variations in ACL injury rates. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 11(4): 263-268.##
22. Hanson AM, Padua DA, Blackburn JT, Prentice WE, Hirth CJ. 2008. Muscle activation during side-step cutting maneuvers in male and female soccer athletes. J Athl Train, 43(2):133-43. ##
23. Arampatzis A, Bruggemann G. 2001. Leg stiffness and mechanical energetic processes during jumping on a sprung surface. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33(6):923-931.##
24. Viitasalo JT. Salo A, Lahtinen J. 1998. Neuromuscular functioning of athletes and non-athletes in the drop jumps. Eue J Appl Physiol 78(5):432-440.##
25. Bastian AJ. 2006. Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feed-foward movement control. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 16 (4):645-649.##
26. Dyhre-Poulsen P, Laursen AM.1980. Programmed and reflex muscular activity in monkeys landing from a leap. In spinal and supraspinal control mechanisms of voluntary motor control and locomotion. Karger, Basel, 323-329. ##
)