اثربخشی مداخله توانبخشی شناختی رایانه -محور بر بهبود توجه انتخابی، توجه مداوم و توجه تقسیم شده در بیماران مبتلا به سکته مغزی در شهر تبریز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی، گروه روانشناسی عمومی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران

3 استاد، گروه نورولوژی، مرکز تحقیقات علوم اعصاب، پژوهشکده سالمندی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز، تبریز، ایران

4 دانشیار، آزمایشگاه علوم اعصاب شناختی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه و اهداف
سکته مغزی مهمترین بیماری نورولوژیک در افراد مسن است. آسیب ­های شناختی از قبیل نقص در توجه به­عنوان یکی از مشکلات شایع در افراد مبتلا به سکته مغزی می­ باشد؛ از این رو، مطالعه حاضر با هدف "بررسی تاثیر توانبخشی شناختی رایانه-محور بر عملکرد توجه مداوم، توجه تقسیم ­شده و توجه انتخابی بیماران مبتلا به سکته مغزی" انجام گرفت.
مواد و روش­ ها
مطالعه حاضر یک پژوهش نیمه ­تجربی با طرح پیش ­آزمون-پس ­آزمون با گروه کنترل می­باشد. در این پژوهش 30 بیمار 30 تا 65 ساله مبتلا به سکته مغزی که ملاک­های ورود به پژوهش را داشتند، به ­صورت تصادفی به گروه­ های آزمایش و کنترل تقسیم شدند. افراد گروه آزمایش با استفاده از نرم­افزار توانبخشی شناختی کاپیتان لاگ 21 جلسه آموزش دیدند و افراد گروه کنترل در آن دوره هیچ­گونه مداخله­ ای دریافت نکردند. در این پژوهش از آزمون عملکرد پیوسته دیداری و شنیداری در پیش ­آزمون و پس­ آزمون استفاده شد.
یافته­ ها
تحلیل داده­ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل کوواریانس تک­متغیره نشان داد که تفاوت معناداری بین نمرات توجه (توجه انتخابی، توجه مداوم و توجه تقسیم­شده) گروه آزمایش و گروه کنترل در پس­آزمون وجود دارد.
نتیجه­ گیری
با عنایت به یافته­ های پژوهش حاضر، این طور استنباط می­شود که می­توان از برنامه­ های توانبخشی شناختی کامپیوتری برای بهبود مولفه ­های توجه افراد دچار سکته مغزی استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Computer-based Cognitive Rehabilitation Intervention on Selective Attention, Sustained Attention, and Divided Attention of Patients with Stroke in Tabriz

نویسندگان [English]

  • Elham Ghorbanian 1
  • Marziyeh Alivandi Vafa 2
  • Mahdi Farhoudi 3
  • Mohammad Ali Nazari 4
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of General Psychology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3 Professor, Neurosciences Research Center, Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Aims: Stroke is the most important neurological disease in old people. Cognitive impairment, such as attention deficit, is one of the common problems in stroke patients. So, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation on sustained attention, divided attention, and selective attention  function in patients with stroke.
Materials and Methods: A quasi- experimental investigation was carried out using a pretest- posttest design and a control group. A total of 30 stroke patients aged 30-65 meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group was trained for 21 sessions using Captain’s Log Cognitive Rehabilitation Software, but the control group did not receive any intervention. Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test was used as pretest and posttest.
Results: Data analysis, using single-variable covariance, showed a significant difference between experimental and control groups in attention scores (selective attention, sustained attention, and divided attention).
Conclusion:According to the findings of the present study, it can be deduced that computer cognitive rehabilitation programs can be used to improve the components of attention in people with stroke.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Stroke
  • Cognitive rehabilitation
  • Selective attention
  • Sustained attention
  • Divided attention

مراجع

  1. Feigin VL, Krishnamurthi RV, Parmar P, Norrving B, Mensah GA, et al. Update on the global burden of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in 1990-2013: the GBD 2013 study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45:161-76.##
  2. Yang Q, Tong X, Schieb L, Vaughan A, Gillespie C, Wiltz JL, King SC, Odom E, Merritt R, Hong Y, George MG. Vital Signs: Recent Trends in Stroke Death Rates—United States, 2000–2015. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2017; 66(35): 933-39. ##
  3. Zorowitz R, Brainin M. Advances in brain recovery and rehabilitation 2011. Stroke; 2011,42(2):294-97. ##
  4. Miklos Z ,Mychailyszyn M, Parente R. The  Efficacy  of  Cognitive  Rehabilitation  Therapy:  A Meta-Analytic  Review  of Traumatic Brain Injury and Stroke Cognitive Language Rehabilitation Literature. American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience. 2015; 3(2): 15-22. ##
  5. Borhani-Haghighi A, Safari R, Heydari ST, Soleimani F, Sharifian M, Kashkuli SY, Khayatghuchani MN, Azadi M, Shariat A, Safari A. Hospital mortality associated with stroke in southern Iran. Iranian journal of medical sciences. 2013; 38(4):314. ##
  6. Chin PA, Finocchiaro D, Rosebrough A. Rehabilitation Nursing Practice, 3 nd Ed. USA: McGraw Hill; 2010.p.264. ##
  7. Pendlebury ST, Cuthbertson FC, Welch SJ, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Underestimation of cognitive impairment by Mini-Mental State Examination versus the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with transient ischemic attack and stroke. Stroke. 2010, 41(6):1290-1293. ##
  8. Bour A, Rasquin S, Boreas A, Limburg M, Verhey F. How predictive is the MMSE for cognitive performance after stroke? Journal of neurology. 2010; 257(4):630-637. ##
  9. Pantone, L. Have Stroke Neurologists Entered the Arena of Stroke-Related Cognitive Dysfunctions? Not yet, but They shoud. Journal of Amerrican Heart Assosiation. 2017; 48:1441-1442. ##

10. Toby BC, Randolph SM, Ronald ML. stroke,cognitive,deficits and rehabilitation: still an incomplete picture. international journal of stroke.  2013; 8:38-45. ##

11. Barker-Collo S, Feigin V, Parag V, Lawes C, Senior H. Auckland stroke outcomes study part 2: Cognition and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology. 2010; 75(18):1608-1616. ##

12. Loetscher T, Lincoln NB. Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 5:CD002842. ##

13. van de Ven RM, Murre JMJ, Veltman DJ and Schmand BA. Computer-Based Cognitive Training for Executive Functions after Stroke: A Systematic Review Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2016; 10:150. ##

14. Stapleton T, Ashburn A, Stack E. A pilot study of attention deficits, balance control and falls in the subacute stage following stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2001; 15(4):437-444. ##

15. Penner IK, Kappos L. Retraining attention in  MS. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2006; 245 (1):147-151. ##

16. Mitchell AJ, Kemp S, Benito-Leon J, Reuber M. The influence of cognitive impairment on health-related quality of life in neurological disease. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2010; 22:2–13. ##

17. Nys GMS, van Zandvoort MJE, van der Worp HB, deHaan EHF, de Kort PLM, Jansen BPW. Early cognitive impairment predicts long-term depressive symptoms and quality of life after stroke. Journal of the Neurological Sciences.  2006; 247:149–56. ##

18. Sohlberg MC, Matter CA. Cognitive rehabilitation: An Integrative  Neuropsychological  Approach.  The  Guilford press. 2001. ##

19. Claesson L, Lindén T, Skoog I, Blomstrand C. Cognitive impairment after stroke- Impact  on  activities  of  daily  living  and  costs  of  care  for  elderly  people. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2005;19(2):102-9. ##

20. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2011;92:519–30##

21. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychology. 1971; 9(1): 97-113. ##

22. Alipour A, Agah Haris M. Reliability and validity of the Edinburgh handedness questionnaire in Iran. Journal of Psychologlical Sciences. 2007; 6(22): 117-33. [In Persian] ##

23. Nasredddine ZS, Phillips NA, BedirianV, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognititive Assessment MOCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment . journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2005; 53(4): 695-699. ##

24. Emsaki G, Molavi H,  Chitsaz A, Movahed Abtahi M, Asgari K. Psychometric Properties of the   Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in Parkinson's Disease Patients in Isfahan. Journal of Isfahan Medical School . 2011; 29(158): 1391-1399. [In Persian] ##

25. Ghaziri J, Tucholka A,  Larue V, Blanchette-Sylvestre M, Reyburn G, Gilbert G, Beauregard M. Neurofeedback Training Induces Changes in White and Gray Matter.Clinical EEG Neuroscience. 2013, DOI: 10.1177/155005941347603. ##

26. White JN,  Hutchens TA, Lubar JF. Quantitative electroencephalographic assessment during neuropsychological task performance in adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Adult Development. 2005; 12 (2-3): 113-121. ##

27. Sandford JA, Turner A. Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test Manual. Richmond, VA: Braintrain Inc; 2000. ##

28. Gholami R, Esteki M, Nosratabadi M. Relationship between IVA Measures and QEEG Pattern in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. 2017, 3(3): 25-38. ##

29. Jenaabadi H, Gavidel- Heidari M. Comparative Examination of Attention and answer control rate in two groups of people with Attention – Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Cognitive Disorder. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning. 2017, 5(9): 2-11. ##

30. Shahsavarani A,  Rasoulzadeh k, Ashayeri H, Satari K. The impact  of  stress  on  selective  attention  and visual  focus  with  regard  to  its  effect  on  teaching  and  learning.  New  Thoughts  on Education. 2011; 4 (6): 169-194. [In Persian] ##

31. Chen CX, Mao RH, Li SX, ZHAO YN, Zhang M. Effect of visual training on cognitive function in stroke patients. International journal of Nursing sciences. 2015;4(2):329-333. ##

32. Barker-Collo SL, Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Parag V, Senior H, Rodgers A. Reducing attention deficits after stroke using attention process training: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2009, 40(10):3293-3298. ##

  1. 33.  Akerlund E, Esbjörnsson E, Sunnerhagen KS, Björkdahl A. Can computerized working memory training improve  impaired working memory, cognition and psychological health? Brain Injury. 2013; 27 (13-14):1649-1657. ##

34. Mainero  C, Caramia  F, Pozzilli  C, Pisani  A,  Pestalozza I,  Borriello G, Bozzao L,  Pantano P. FMRI  evidence  of  brain  reorganization  during attention and memory tasks in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2004; 21(3): 858–67. ##

35. Cho HY, Kim KT, Jung JH. Effects of computer assisted cognitive rehabilitation on brain wave, memory and attention of stroke patients: a randomized control trial. Journal of physical therapy science. 2015;27(4):1029-1032##

36. Stathopoulou S, Lubar JF. EEG changes in traumatic brain injured patients after cognitive rehabilitation.  Journal of Neurotherapy. 2004; 8 (2): 21- 51. ##

37. Khanjani  Z, Farhoudi M, Nazari M, Saeedi M, Abravani, P. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on selective and divided attention and executive function in adults with stroke. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry. 2018; 5(3):81-94 [In Persian]. ##

38. Rohring S, Kulke H, Reulbach U, Peetz H, Schupp W: Effectivity of a neuropsychological training in attention functions by a teletherapeutic setting. Neurologie and Rehabilitation. 2004; 10(5):239-46. ##

39. Kolb  B, Wishaw YQ, Fundamental  of  human neuropsychology: Tehran;  Arjomand. 2015.P. 464.  ## 

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی طب توانبخشی
دوره 9، شماره 1
فروردین 1399
صفحه 137-146

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 16 اردیبهشت 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 29 خرداد 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 05 تیر 1398
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 فروردین 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار