پیش بینی آسیب های اسکلتی-عضلانی ورزشکاران باشگاهی از طریق امتیازات انفرادی و مرکب آزمون غربالگری حرکت عملکردی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد حرکات اصلاحی و آسیب شناسی ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه و اهداف
امروزه امتیاز بیشتر از 14 در آزمون غربالگری حرکت عملکردی برای پیش­بینی آسیب در جمعیت­های ورزشکار استفاده می­شود. عدم تقارن یا محدودیت الگوی حرکتی در آزمون غربالگری حرکت عملکردی ممکن است توانایی پیش­بینی آسیب­های اسکلتی- عضلانی را داشته باشد؛ بنابراین هدف پژوهش حاضر، پیش­بینی آسیب­های اسکلتی-عضلانی ورزشکاران باشگاهی از طریق امتیازات انفرادی و مرکب آزمون غربالگری حرکت عملکردی بود.
مواد و روش­ ها
در تحقیق حاضر جامعه آماری شامل 50 ورزشکار باشگاهی در دسترس (25 مرد، 25 زن)، با میانگین سنی 25/2±19 سال بود. از آزمون­های غربالگری حرکت عملکردی برای ارزیابی آزمودنی­ها استفاده شد. وقوع آسیب­های اسکلتی-عضلانی توسط پزشک رسمی تیم ورزشی، برای سال 95-94 پیگیری شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها در سطح معناداری 05/0 با استفاده از آزمون آماری 2X و منحنی ROC انجام شد.
یافته­ ها
یافته­ ها نشان داد میانگین امتیاز مرکب غربالگری حرکت عملکردی در گروه آسیب­دیده پایین­تر از گروه سالم بود. همچنین ورزشکارانی که حداقل دارای یک عدم تقارن یا محدودیت الگوی حرکتی در آزمون­های انفرادی بودند، نسبت به ورزشکاران فاقد عدم تقارن یا محدودیت الگوی حرکتی، بیشتر متحمل آسیب­های عضلانی-اسکلتی شدند. ورزشکاران با امتیاز 14≥ نسبت به افراد با امتیاز 14> آسیب­های اسکلتی-عضلانی را بیشتر متحمل شدند.
نتیجه­ گیری
به نظر می‌رسد ورزشکاران با امتیاز 14≥ نسبت به افراد با امتیاز 14> آسیب­های عضلانی-اسکلتی را بیشتر متحمل می­شوند. عدم تقارن یا امتیاز یک در آزمون­های انفرادی غربالگری حرکت عملکردی هم­راستا با امتیاز مرکب می­تواند برای پیش­بینی احتمال وقوع آسیب در ورزشکاران باشگاهی به کار برده شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prediction of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Athletes Using Individual and Composite Scores on Functional Movement Screening Test

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Letafatkar 1
  • Mohadseh Salehi Sarbizhan 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Biomechanic and Sport Injury, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Master in Corrective Exercises, Department of Biomechanics and Sport Injuries, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science. University of Kharazmi, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Aim: Scores above 14 in Functional Movement Screen (FMS) test are nowdays used to predict injury in the athletic population. According to title proposed, asymmetry or movement pattern limitation in functional movement screen test might predict musculoskeletal injuries. The objective of the present study was predicting musculoskeletal injuries in athletes using individual and composite scores on functional movement screening test.
Materials and Methods: In the current study, participants included a total of 50 athletes (25 males and 25 females) with a mean age of 19±2.25. FMS tests were used to assess participants' performance. Occurrence of musculoskeletal injuries was diagnosed by an official physician of athletic teams in 2015-2016. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS running x2 statistical test and ROC curve with p. value set at 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the average composite score of FMS in injured group was lower than that of healthy group. Also, athletes who had a minimum of one asymmetry or limitation on the movement pattern in individual tests versus those without asymmetry or movement pattern limitation were more susceptible to musculoskeletal injuries.
Conclusion: According to the results, athletes with scores lower than or equal to 14 experience more   musculoskeletal injuries than those with scores more than 14. Thus, asymmetry or score one in functional movement screen individual tests along with composite score can be used for predicting occurrence of injury in athletes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Asymmetry
  • Individual test
  • Injury risk
  • Functional movement screen test
  • Movement pattern

مراجع

  1. Yang J, Tibbetts AS, Covassin T, Cheng G, Nayar S, Heiden E. Epidemiology of overuse and acute injuries among competitive collegiate athletes. J Athl Train. 2012 Mar-Apr;47(2):198-204.##
  2. .Bahr R,HolmeI. Risk factors for sports injuriesa methodological approach. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(5):384-92. ##
  3. Wilkerson GB, Giles JL, Seibel DK.Prediction of core and lower extremity strains and sprains in collegiate football players: a preliminary study. J Athl Train. 2012 May-Jun;47(3):264-72. ##
  4. Hubbard TJ, Carpenter M, CordovaML.V. Contributing factors to medial tibial stress syndrome: a prospective investigation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Mar;41(3):490-6. ##
  5. Leetun DT, Ireland ML, Willson JD. Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Jun;36(6):926-34. ##
  6. Gaida JE, Cook JL, Bass SL. Adiposity and tendinopathy. Disability and rehabilitation. 2008 Jan 1;30(20-22):1555-62.Hughes G. A review of recent perspectives on biomechanical risk factors associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Research in sports medicine. 2014 Apr 3;22(2):193-212. ##
  7. Freeman MA. Instability of the foot affer injuries to the lateral ligament of the ankle. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 1965 Nov;47(4):669-77. ##
  8. Flanigan DC, Everhart JS, Pedroza A, Smith T, Kaeding CC. Fear of reinjury (kinesiophobia) and persistent knee symptoms are common factors for lack of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2013 Aug 1;29(8):1322-9. ##
  9. Myer GD, Kushner AM, Brent JL, Schoenfeld BJ, Hugentobler J, Lloyd RS, Vermeil A, Chu DA, Harbin J, McGill SM. The back squat: A proposed assessment of functional deficits and technical factors that limit performance. Strength and conditioning journal. 2014 Dec 1;36(6):4. ##

10. Bredeweg SW, Buist I, Kluitenberg B. Differences in kinetic asymmetry between injured and noninjured novice runners: a prospective cohort study. Gait & posture. 2013 Sep 1;38(4):847-52. ##

11. Kiesel KB, Butler RJ, Plisky PJ. Prediction of injury by limited and asymmetrical fundamental movement patterns in american football players. Journal of sport rehabilitation. 2014 May;23(2):88-94. ##

12. Chapman RF, Laymon AS, Arnold T. Functional movement scores and longitudinal performance outcomes in elite track and field athletes. International journal of sports physiology and performance. 2014 Mar;9(2):203-11. ##

13. Plisky PJ, Rauh MJ, Kaminski TW, Underwood FB. Star Excursion Balance Test as a predictor of lower extremity injury in high school basketball players. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2006 Dec;36(12):911-9. ##

14. Mokha M, Sprague PA, Gatens DR. Predicting musculoskeletal injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II athletes from asymmetries and individual-test versus composite functional movement screen scores. Journal of athletic training. 2016 Apr;51(4):276-82. ##

15. Hewett TE, Ford KR, Myer GD. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 2, a meta-analysis of neuromuscular interventions aimed at injury prevention. The American journal of sports medicine. 2006 Mar;34(3):490-8. ##

16. Clifton DR, Grooms DR, Onate JA. Overhead deep squat performance predicts Functional Movement Screen™ score. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2015 Oct;10(5):622. ##

17. Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen?. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT. 2007 Aug;2(3):147. ##

18. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 2. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2014 Aug;9(4):549. ##

19. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function‐part 1. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2014 May;9(3):396. ##

20. O'connor FG, Deuster PA, Davis J, Pappas CG, Knapik JJ. Functional movement screening: predicting injuries in officer candidates. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2011 Dec;43(12):2224-30. ##

21. Lehr ME, Plisky PJ, Butler RJ, Fink ML, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB. Field‐expedient screening and injury risk algorithm categories as predictors of noncontact lower extremity injury. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2013 Aug;23(4):e225-32. ##

22. Minick KI, Kiesel KB, Burton L, Taylor A, Plisky P, Butler RJ. Interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2010 Feb 1;24(2):479-86. ##

23. Garrison M, Westrick R, Johnson MR, Benenson J. Association between the functional movement screen and injury development in college athletes. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2015 Feb;10(1):21. ##

24. Beutler AI, Sarah J, Marshall SW, Padua DA, Boden BP. Muscle strength and qualitative jump-landing differences in male and female military cadets: The jump-ACL study. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2009 Dec;8(4):663. ##

25. Hertel J, Braham RA, Hale SA, Olmsted-Kramer LC. Simplifying the star excursion balance test: analyses of subjects with and without chronic ankle instability. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2006 Mar;36(3):131-7. ##

26. Kazman JB, Galecki JM, Lisman P, Deuster PA, O'connor FG. Factor structure of the functional movement screen in marine officer candidates. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2014 Mar 1;28(3):672-8. ##

27. Wiese BW, Boone JK, Mattacola CG, McKeon PO, Uhl TL. Determination of the functional movement screen to predict musculoskeletal injury in intercollegiate athletics. Athletic Training and Sports Health Care. 2014 Jul 17;6(4):161-9. ##

28. Brumitt J, Heiderscheit BC, Manske RC, Niemuth PE, Rauh MJ. Lower extremity functional tests and risk of injury in division iii collegiate athletes. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2013 Jun;8(3):216. ##

29. Sorenson EA. Functional movement screen as a predictor of injury in high school basketball athletes.  University of Oregon.2009. ##

30. Kiesel K, Plisky P, Butler R. Functional movement test scores improve following a standardized off‐season intervention program in professional football players. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2011 Apr;21(2):287-92. ##

31. Brown M. The ability of the functional movement screen in predicting injury rates in Division female athletes. 2011; 541##

32. Chorba RS, Chorba DJ, Bouillon LE, Overmyer CA, Landis JA. Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. North American journal of sports physical therapy: NAJSPT. 2010 Jun;5(2):47. ##

33. Chase KI, Caine DJ, Goodwin BJ, Whitehead JR, Romanick MA. A prospective study of injury affecting competitive collegiate swimmers. Research in Sports Medicine. 2013 Apr 1;21(2):111-23. ##

34. Emery CA. Identifying risk factors for hamstring and groin injuries in sport: a daunting task. Clinical journal of sport medicine. 2012 Jan 1;22(1):75-7. ##

35. Engebretsen AH, Myklebust G, Holme I, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Intrinsic risk factors for groin injuries among male soccer players: a prospective cohort study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010 Oct;38(10):2051-7. ##

36. Paterno MV, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Rauh MJ, Myer GD, Huang B, Hewett TE. Biomechanical measures during landing and postural stability predict second anterior cruciate ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport. The American journal of sports medicine. 2010 Oct;38(10):1968-78.   ##

37. Okada T, Huxel KC, Nesser TW. Relationship between core stability, functional movement, and performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2011 Jan 1;25(1):252-61. ##

38. Bodden JG, Needham RA, Chockalingam N. The effect of an intervention program on functional movement screen test scores in mixed martial arts athletes. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2015 Jan 1;29(1):219-25. ##

39. Maulder PS. Dominant limb asymmetry associated with prospective injury occurrence. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation. 2013 Jan 1;35(1):121-31. ##

دوماهنامه علمی - پژوهشی طب توانبخشی
دوره 7، شماره 4
آذر و دی 1397
صفحه 51-64

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 01 آذر 1396
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 26 فروردین 1397
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 05 اردیبهشت 1397
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 دی 1397

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار